USHA RANI filed a consumer case on 13 Mar 2023 against DEVYA SOOD in the West Delhi Consumer Court. The case no is CC/18/225 and the judgment uploaded on 14 Mar 2023.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-III: WEST
C-BLOCK, COMMUNITY CENTRE, PANKHA ROAD, JANAK PURI
NEW DELHI-110058
Complaint Case No.225/2018
IN THE MATTER OF:
Mr. Usha Rani
W/o Late Sh. Raj Kumar,
R/o BG-5/65A, Paschim Vihar,
New Delhi - 110063
...Complainant
Versus
Ms. Divya Sood,
Prop. Of M/s Body care,
(Slimming & Beauty Clinic for Men and Women)
A-15, Vishal Enclave,
1st Floor, Rajouri Garden,
New Delhi-110027. …Opposite Party
| DATE OF INSTITUTION: JUDGMENT RESERVED ON: DATE OF DECISION: | 01.06.2018 27.02.2023 13.03.2023 |
CORAM
Ms. Sonica Mehrotra, President
Ms.Richa Jindal, Member
Mr. Anil Kumar Koushal, Member
Present: Mr. Y.K.Dubey, counsel for the complaint.
OP Ex parte.
ORDER
Per: Anil Kumar Koushal, Member
For the sake of brevity, the following facts of the case are noted hereunder:
1 Complainant states that OP is running a Slimming & Beauty Clinic for Men and Women at the aforesaid address. The complainant received phone calls frequently in the first and second weeks of July 2017 to join Body Care Slimming & Beauty Clinic run by OP for weight loss and she was requested to visit OP’s office. The complainant visited OP’s clinic on 20/07/2017 and met her and one Ms. Ekta, where the OP offered the complainant a scheme for "10 kg weight loss + 10 Tummy-tuck" and suggested the complainant to join the scheme @ monthly charges of Rs. 1,450/- The complainant accepted the aforesaid offer of the OP and made a cash payment of Rs.1,000/- on her first visit i.e. on 20/07/2017 vide Receipt No. DHS-17-18/ 214.
2. The complainant again visited OP’s clinic on 22/07/2017 and as per the agreed terms, she requested employee of the OP namely Ms. Ekta to take the balance payment of Rs.450/- towards the first month charges and handed over her debit card of Central Bank of India. However, the said employee of the OP deducted Rs. 17,000/- from the complainant's debit card of Central Bank of India without her consent and issued another Receipt of the same amount. The complainant objected to this and sought refund of the excess amount but the same was not refunded to her. Complainant visited the office of OP again on 23/07/2017 but OP refused to give the refund of excess amount so withdrawn in an unauthorised manner. The complainant was requested by the OP to start the treatment /exercise for which the complainant was asked to lay down on a machine where the complainant had severe pain in her stomach due to the treatment and the complainant refused to take such treatment. Thereafter, the complainant was shifted to another bed and mud therapy was started but the complainant was feeling very uncomfortable during the mud therapy too. The complainant called OP's employee 2-3 times and became unconscious for about half an hour. Thereafter the complainant was not aware what happened during the period of unconsciousness. Complainant states that she was not given proper treatment even after her consciousness. As such the complainant was very much scared of the treatment provided by the OP and again requested to refund the entire amount as the complainant was not at all satisfied with the treatment given in the clinic of the OP for weight-loss and the OP also deceitfully withdrew/ debited total amount of Rs.17,000/-in place of Rs.450/- without her consent. Thereafter the complainant has never taken any treatment or continued availing OP's services anymore due to fear. However, the complainant requested the OP several times through phone and even visited her clinic for getting refund of the amount illegally withdrawn from the complainant's debit card of Central Bank of India but no refund has been made till date. However, the OP insisted the complainant again and again to book the appointment and avail the package for weight-loss. Finding no other way, the complainant got issued a Legal Notice dated 03/04/2018 demanding refund of Rs.18,000/- illegally debited from her Debit Card along with compensation for harassment, mental agony and mental & physical injuries caused by the deficient services of the OP. But no response from the OP has yet been received. Ultimately, for not getting refund of the amount illegally withdrawn from her account, the complainant was forced to file the present complaint. The complainant makes the following prayers:
S.no. | Particulars | AMOUNT |
I | Refund of amount paid & debited | 18,000/- |
Ii | Compensation for Deficiency in services & Unfair Trade practice causing harassment, mental agony as well as mental & physical injuries. | 50,000/- |
Iii | Litigation cost | 10,000/- |
| Total amount | 78,000/- |
3. The complainant filed with the complaint copy of Cash Memo No.DHS-17-18/214 for Rs.1000/-, Cash Memo No.DHS-17-18/232 dated 22.07.2017 in the sum of Rs.17,000/- paid through debit card, legal notice dated 03.04.2018.
4. Upon admission of the complaint on 06.06.2018, notice was issued to the OP. On 20.08.2018, counsel for the OP put in appearance, filed his vakalatnama and sought time to file the written statement. However, later on the written statement within the statutory period was not filed nor the OP was represented and accordingly vide order dated 05.12.2018 was proceeded against ex parte.
5. Ex parte evidence was filed by the complainant and she exhibited the documents filed on record. Written arguments were filed by the complainant. Oral arguments were heard on 27th February, 2023. During arguments, counsel for the complainant submitted that the payment of Rs.17,000/- was made through debit card. Though the OP has issued a receipt for the sum of Rs.17,000/- but it was not clear whether the amount was debited from the account of complainant or not. Therefore, Counsel for the complainant was directed to place on record the proof of debit of the amount from the account of the complainant. Counsel for the complainant has filed a statement of account of Central Bank of India where the complainant is maintaining her account which shows that the amount of Rs.17,000/- was debited from the account of complainant on 22.07.2017.
6. Having gone through the documents filed on record and the arguments advanced by counsel for the complainant, since there is no rebuttal to the averments of complainant, we hold that the complainant has made out a case of unfair trade practice followed by the OP by deducting Rs.17,000/- from the debit card of the complainant in place of Rs.450/-. We agree with the complainant that the package was taken by her initially for a month only and accordingly offered to pay Rs.1450/- on monthly basis depending upon the efficacy of the treatment. However, the complainant was cheated of her money by Rs.16,550/- in excess of what was promised. Further the complainant had taken treatment only for one day and that too she had to leave in between as she fell unconscious because of wrong treatment given to her. Therefore, the OP was not entitled to charge Rs.18,000/- for the whole package unauthorisedly. Accordingly, we hold that the OP has indulged in unfair trade practice by charging Rs.18,000/- from the complainant for the whole package in advance. The complaint is allowed and the OP is directed to refund the amount of Rs.18,000/- to the complainant. The OP shall also pay to the complainant Rs.7,000/- towards mental harassment and Rs.5,000/- towards litigation expenses. Let this order be complied with by the OP within thirty days of receipt of copy of this order.
A copy of this order shall be supplied free of cost to parties to the dispute in the present complaint, upon a written requisition being made in writing in the name of President of the Commission in terms of Regulation 21 of the Consumer Protection Regulations, 2020.
File be consigned to record room.
(Richa Jindal) (Anil Kumar Koushal) (Sonica Mehrotra)
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.