Kerala

Kollam

CC/327/2020

Ruffina Raju, - Complainant(s)

Versus

Designated Partner,Thomas Daniel, - Opp.Party(s)

Adv.P.SAJEEV BABU

14 Oct 2022

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Civil Station ,
Kollam-691013.
Kerala.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/327/2020
( Date of Filing : 25 Nov 2020 )
 
1. Ruffina Raju,
6.361,4/228-MTR Bhavan,Naduvilakkara,Alummoodu.P.O,Kollam-691577.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Designated Partner,Thomas Daniel,
My Popular Marine Products LLP Regd.Office.13/575,Popular Tower, Vakayar.P.O,Konni,Pathanamthitta-689698.
2. S.Peter,
Branch Manager,My Popular Marine Products LLP,Kannanalloor,Residing at, Shalom, Eravipuram.P.O,Kollam-691011.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. E.M.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. SANDHYA RANI.S MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. STANLY HAROLD MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 14 Oct 2022
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL  COMMISSION, KOLLAM

Dated this the   14th      Day of  October   2022

 

  Present: -  Sri. E.M.Muhammed Ibrahim, B.A, LL.M. President

        Smt.S.Sandhya Rani, Bsc, L.L.B,Member

                   Sri.Stanly Harold, B.A.LLB, Member

 

                                                CC.327/2020

 

Ruffina Raju                                                         :         Complainant

6/361,4/228-MTR Bhavan

Naduvilakkara, Alummoodu P.O

Kollam-691577.

[By Adv.P.Sajeev Babu]

 

V/s

  1. My Popular Marine Products LLP                :         Opposite parties

        Regd.Office:13/575,Popular Tower

       Vakayar P.O, Konni

       Pathanamthitta-689698

       Represented by its Designated Partner

       Thomas Daniel.

  1. S.Peter

        Branch Manager

       My Popular Marine Products LLP

      Kannanalloor

      Residing at,

      Shalom, Eravipuram P.O

       Kollam-691011.

 

 

FINAL    ORDER

E.M.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM , B.A, LL.M, President

Complainant absent.  Counsel for the complainant submits that he has no instruction from the complainant.  Though the case is posted for recording exparte evidence, the complainant is not turning up and adducing exparte evidence.

The document produced along with the complaint is only an unattested copy of a receipt showing that the complainant has contributed to Limited liability partnership firm which is not a fixed deposit receipt.  Hence we are of the view that there is no merit in the complaint and the same is only to be dismissed.

In the result complaint stands dismissed.

          No costs

Dated this the  14th   day of   October  2022.

 

E.M.Muhammed Ibrahim:Sd/-

S.Sandhya Rani:Sd/-

            Stanly Harold:Sd/-

         Forwarded/by Order

          Senior Superintendent

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. E.M.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. SANDHYA RANI.S]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. STANLY HAROLD]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.