Kerala

Kollam

CC/255/2021

Oommachen.C, - Complainant(s)

Versus

Designated Partner,Thomas Daniel, - Opp.Party(s)

Adv.P.SAJEEV BABU

03 Aug 2023

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Railway Station Road
Karbala Junction
Kollam-691001
Kerala.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/255/2021
( Date of Filing : 30 Oct 2021 )
 
1. Oommachen.C,
Alummoottil Thundil Veedu,Ambipioka.P.O,Elamapalloor,Kundara,Kollam-691501.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Designated Partner,Thomas Daniel,
My Popular Marine Products LLP, Regd.Office:13/575, Popular Tower, Vakayar.P.O,Konni, Pathanamthitta-689 698.
2. Y.Mathew Panicker,
Former Branch Manager,Popular Dealers,Kundara, Residing at, Maliyekkal Mathew Bhavan,Punnamukku, Perumpuzha.P.O-691504.
3. T.Mathunni Panicker,
Branch Manager, Popular Dealers, Kundara residing at Plavila Thekkathil Raju Nivas, Ambipioka-691501.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. S.K.SREELA PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. SANDHYA RANI.S MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. STANLY HAROLD MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 03 Aug 2023
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOLLAM

                                             C.C.No. 255/2021

PRESENT

SMT. S.K.SREELA, B.A.L, LL.B, PRESIDENT

     SMT. S.SANDHYA   RANI. BSC, LL.B, MEMBER

   SRI. STANLY HAROLD, B.A.LL.B, MEMBER 

  ORDER DATED:   03-08-2023.

BETWEEN

Oommachan C., Alummoottil Thundil Veedu,

Ambipioka P.O., Elampalloor, Kundara, Kollam 691501.   :           Complainant

(By Adv.P.Sajeev Babu)

AND

  1.   My Popular Marine Products LLP,

Regd.Office: 13/575, Popular Tower,

Vakayar P.O., Konni, Pathanamthitta 689 698

Rep.by its Designated Partner, Thomas Daniel

  1. Y.Mathew Panicker,

Former Branch Manager, Popular Dealers, Kundara,

Residing at Maliyekkal Mathew Bhavan,

Punnamukku, Perumpuzha P.O., Kollam691504. :Opposite Parties

  1. T.Mathunni Panicker,

Branch Manager, Popular Dealers, Kundara residing at

Plavila Thekkathil, Raju Nivas, Ambipoika, 691501.

ORDER

S.K.SREELA, PRESIDENT

              As the counsel for the complainant submitted ‘no instruction’ from the party, notice was issued to the complainant.  Despite acceptance of notice and specific direction to appear today, the complainant has failed to appear and no representation also.  Hence it is deemed that the complainant is not interested to pursue the matter.  Hence the complaint is dismissed.

Dated this the 3rd  day of August 2023.

Sd/-

S.K.SREELA

PRESIDENT

Sd/-

S.SANDHYA RANI

MEMBER

Sd/-

STANLY HAROLD

MEMBER

      Forwarded/by   Order                                                                                                        

           

           

           

                Senior superintendent

           

           

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. S.K.SREELA]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. SANDHYA RANI.S]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. STANLY HAROLD]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.