Kerala

Kollam

CC/61/2021

Mrs.Leelamma Thankachan, - Complainant(s)

Versus

Designated Partner,Thomas Daniel, - Opp.Party(s)

Adv.P.SAJEEV BABU

06 Jun 2023

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Railway Station Road
Karbala Junction
Kollam-691001
Kerala.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/61/2021
( Date of Filing : 11 Feb 2021 )
 
1. Mrs.Leelamma Thankachan,
Pampallil Lalu Building,Ezhukone.P.O,Kollam-691505.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Designated Partner,Thomas Daniel,
Mary Rani Trading LLP,Regd.Office:10/1,Popular Tower, Vakayar.P.O, Konni, Pathanamthitta-689698.
2. Y.Mathew Panicker,
Former Branch Manager, Mary Rani Trading LLP ,Kundara Residing at, Maliyekkal Mathew Bhavan, Punnamukku, Perumpuzha.P.O-691 504.
3. T.Mathunni Panicker,
Branch Manager,Mary Rani Trading LLP, Kundara residing at Plavila Thekkathil Raju Nivas, Ambipioka-691501.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. S.K.SREELA PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. STANLY HAROLD MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 06 Jun 2023
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOLLAM

                                                C.C.No. 61/2021

PRESENT

SMT. S.K.SREELA, B.A.L, LL.B, PRESIDENT

   SRI.    STANLY HAROLD, B.A.LL.B, MEMBER 

  ORDER DATED:   06-06-2023.

BETWEEN

 Mrs.Leelamma Thankachan,

 Pampalil Lalu Building,

 Ezhukone P.O., Kollam 691505.                                                     :           Complainant

 (By Adv. P.Sajeev Babu)

AND

  1. Mary Rani Trading LLP

Regd.Office: 10/1, Popular Tower,

Vakayar P.O., Konni, Pathanamthitta 689 698

Rep.by its Designated Partner                                                       :     Opposite Parties

Thomas Daniel.

  1. Y.Mathew Panicker,

Former Branch Manager, Mary Rani Trading LLP

Kundara, Residing at Maliyekkal Mathew Bhavan,

Punnamukku, Perumpuzha P.O., 691504

  1. T.Mathunni Panicker,

Branch Manager, Mary Rani Trading LLP

Kundara residing at Plavila Thekkathil

Raju Nivas Ambipoika 691501.

ORDER

S.K.SREELA, PRESIDENT

           Complainant’s counsel submitted that no instruction from the complainant. Hence notice was issued to the complainant to appear today.  Despite acceptance of the notice from the Commission to appear today, the complainant remained absent.  No representation also.  Hence it is deemed that the complainant is not interested in proceeding with the complaint.  In view of the above, the complaint is dismissed for default. 

Dated this the 6th  day of June 2023.

                                                                                                                                           Sd/-

S.K.SREELA

PRESIDENT

Sd/-

STANLY HAROLD

MEMBER

Forwarded/by Order                                                                                                          

                       

           

            Senior superintendent

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. S.K.SREELA]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. STANLY HAROLD]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.