Orissa

Rayagada

CC/207/2016

Sujata Mahapatra - Complainant(s)

Versus

DEPUTY Manager, East Cost Railways - Opp.Party(s)

Self

28 Aug 2017

ORDER

DISTRICT   CONSUMER  DISPUTES REDRESSAL    FORUM, RAYAGADA,

STATE:  ODISHA.

C.C. Case  No. 207/ 2016.                        Date.   28. 8. 2017.

P R E S E N T .

Sri GadadharaSahu, B.Sc.                                                  President I/C.

Smt. Padmalaya Mishra, LL.B.                             Member

 

Smt. Sujata Mohapatra, W/O: Gangadhar Padhi, Raniguda Farm,  Po/ Dist: Rayagada,  State:  Odisha.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             …….Complainant

Vrs.

The Deputy Manager, East Coast Raialways, D.R.M office, Daba Garden, Vizag(A.P).

The Station   Manager, Railway  Station, Rayagada.                                                                                                       .…..Opp.Parties

Counsel for the parties

For the complainant:- Self.                      

For the O.Ps:-  Set exparte.     

                                        J u d g e m e n t.

        The  present disputes arises out of the complaint petition filed by the above named complainant alleging deficiency in service  against  afore mentioned O.Ps for non refund of   price a sum of Rs. 582.18 towards  sleeper ticket and  compensation  of   Rs.1,00,000/-  towards  cancellation  of train on Dt.5.7.2016  from Rayagada to Puri  i.e. train No. 12844  Ahamadabada -Puri Express.

 

        On being notice the O.Ps neither appeared nor filed show cause. Hence the O.Ps are set exparte to close the case on the time frame.

 

        Heard from the complainant. Perused the complaint petition and other documents filed  complainant.

 

 

 

 

                                                FINDINGS.

 

On perusal of the  complaint petition this  forum observed  that the matters relating to the refund of   price a sum of Rs. 582.18 towards  sleeper ticket and  compensation  of   Rs.1,00,000/-  towards  cancellation  of train  Under section-13 of the Railway Claims Tribunal  Act, 1987 will not come under the purview of the C.P. Act, 1986.  This forum has lack of jurisdiction to entertain the  above dispute  and adjudicate  the same under the provisions  of the C.P. Act, 1986.  The case is not maintainable in view of the above discussion.

The grievance of the complainant can be raised  before the appropriate court of law and not before this forum. We  do not  think  proper to go  into merit of this case.

Hence, the claim of the   complainant can not be accepted under the provisions of the C.P. Act. It is open to  complainant   ordinary remedy to approach proper forum.       

 

So  to meet the  ends of justice    the following order is passed.

 

ORDER.

          In the result with these observations, findings, discussion  the complainant  is free to approach the court of competent  having  its jurisdiction.   Parties are left to bear their own cost.  Accordingly the case  is closed.

 

Dictated and corrected by me

Pronounced on this           28th.          Day of   August,                           2017.

 

                                               

                                                            Member.                                              President

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.