View 579 Cases Against Railways
View 579 Cases Against Railways
Sujata Mahapatra filed a consumer case on 28 Aug 2017 against DEPUTY Manager, East Cost Railways in the Rayagada Consumer Court. The case no is CC/207/2016 and the judgment uploaded on 11 Sep 2017.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, RAYAGADA,
STATE: ODISHA.
C.C. Case No. 207/ 2016. Date. 28. 8. 2017.
P R E S E N T .
Sri GadadharaSahu, B.Sc. President I/C.
Smt. Padmalaya Mishra, LL.B. Member
Smt. Sujata Mohapatra, W/O: Gangadhar Padhi, Raniguda Farm, Po/ Dist: Rayagada, State: Odisha. …….Complainant
Vrs.
The Deputy Manager, East Coast Raialways, D.R.M office, Daba Garden, Vizag(A.P).
The Station Manager, Railway Station, Rayagada. .…..Opp.Parties
Counsel for the parties:
For the complainant:- Self.
For the O.Ps:- Set exparte.
J u d g e m e n t.
The present disputes arises out of the complaint petition filed by the above named complainant alleging deficiency in service against afore mentioned O.Ps for non refund of price a sum of Rs. 582.18 towards sleeper ticket and compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- towards cancellation of train on Dt.5.7.2016 from Rayagada to Puri i.e. train No. 12844 Ahamadabada -Puri Express.
On being notice the O.Ps neither appeared nor filed show cause. Hence the O.Ps are set exparte to close the case on the time frame.
Heard from the complainant. Perused the complaint petition and other documents filed complainant.
FINDINGS.
On perusal of the complaint petition this forum observed that the matters relating to the refund of price a sum of Rs. 582.18 towards sleeper ticket and compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- towards cancellation of train Under section-13 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 will not come under the purview of the C.P. Act, 1986. This forum has lack of jurisdiction to entertain the above dispute and adjudicate the same under the provisions of the C.P. Act, 1986. The case is not maintainable in view of the above discussion.
The grievance of the complainant can be raised before the appropriate court of law and not before this forum. We do not think proper to go into merit of this case.
Hence, the claim of the complainant can not be accepted under the provisions of the C.P. Act. It is open to complainant ordinary remedy to approach proper forum.
So to meet the ends of justice the following order is passed.
ORDER.
In the result with these observations, findings, discussion the complainant is free to approach the court of competent having its jurisdiction. Parties are left to bear their own cost. Accordingly the case is closed.
Dictated and corrected by me
Pronounced on this 28th. Day of August, 2017.
Member. President
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.