Delhi

East Delhi

CC/284/2023

SANJEEV RAKHRA - Complainant(s)

Versus

DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION ZONE-2 - Opp.Party(s)

01 Aug 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION (EAST)

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI

CONVENIENT SHOPPING CENTRE, FIRST FLOOR,

SAINI ENCLAVE, DELHI – 110 092

 

C.C. No.284/2023

 

 

SANJEEV RAKHRA,

S/O LATE SH. K.J. RAKHRA

R/O: 17/5, GROUND FLOOR,

RAM NAGAR, KRISHNA NAGAR,

DELHI - 110051

 

 

 

 ….Complainant

Versus

 

 

DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION

ZONE-2

MADHUBAND ROAD, DAYANAND BLOCK,

SHAKARPUR EXTN. SHAKARPUR KHAS,

DELHI – 110092

 

 

 

 

……OP

 

 

Date of Institution

:

30.06.2023

Judgment Reserved on

:

24.07.2023

Judgment Passed on

:

01.08.2023

 

 

                       

QUORUM:

 

Sh. S.S. Malhotra

(President)

Ms. Rashmi Bansal

(Member)

Sh. Ravi Kumar

(Member)

 

 

 

Order By: Shri S.S. Malhotra (President)

 

 

 

ORDER

  1. By this order the Commission shall dispose off the present complaint at the stage of admission of the complaint filed by one Sh. Sanjeev Rakhra, in his own name seeking certified copy of some documents by his brother under Section 76 of Indian Evidence Act. 
  2. Brief facts as stated by the complainant in the complaint are that he is the AR of his brother and his brother had given one complaint dated 04.04.2023 to Dy. Director of Education, Zone-2 (OP) seeking certified copies vide diary No.2156 dated 06.05.2023 but since the copies were not provided he came to the Consumer Commission thereby seeking direction to the OP to supply the certified copy of documents along with compensation alleging himself to be the Consumer.    
  3. Complaint is filed by Sh.Sanjeev Rakhra as an AR but Commission is of the opinion that although Sh. Sanjeev Rakhra may be the AR as per the authority letter but the complaint has to be filed in the name of the aggrieved person i.e. Sh. Rajeev Rakhra and AR cannot file the complaint in his own name irrespective of that he is an AR of the actual complainant.  It is also not explained as to how he is the beneficiary of the documents sought by her brother.  Therefore, complaint case in the present form is not maintainable and the same be rejected. 

Copy of the order be supplied / sent to the parties free of cost as per rules.

File be consigned to Record Room. 

Announced on 01.08.2023.   

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.