Haryana

Ambala

CC/7/2020

Sukhvir Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

Deputy Director of Agri - Opp.Party(s)

Harjinder Singh

16 Aug 2022

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, AMBALA.

 

                                                          Complaint case no.         :        7 of 2020.

                                                          Date of Institution           :     01.01.2020.

                                                          Date of decision    :     16.08.2022.

 

Sukhvir Singh son of Shri Joginder Singh resident of Village Rawallon, Tehsil and District Ambala.

          ……. Complainant.

                                                Versus

1.  Deputy Director of Agriculture, Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Ambala.

2.  The Branch Manager, ICICI Bank Limited, SCF No.4, Vikas Vihar, Ambala Cantt.

3.  The Regional Manager, SBI General Insurance Company, SCO 335-336, 1^st & 2^nd Floor, Sector-35-B, Chandigarh.

                                                                                  ….…. Opposite Parties.      

Before:        Ms. Neena Sandhu, President.

                   Ms. Ruby Sharma, Member,

Sh. Vinod Kumar Sharma, Member.          

                            

Present:       None for the complainant.

          Shri Kulbir Singh, authorized representative for Op No.1.

          Shri Anil Kaushik, Advocate, counsel for OP No.2.

          Shri R.K.Vig, Advocate, counsel for the OP No.3.

 

          Complaint under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986

Order:-      

 

          Today, the case was fixed for leading evidence by the complainant, subject to payment of costs of Rs.800/- in the legal aid account of this Commission, but none appeared on behalf of the complainant. From the perusal of zimni orders, it is revealed that even on the last date of hearing i.e. 14.07.2022, none appeared on behalf of the complainant and inspite of taking several opportunities evidence has not been lead by the complainant. Case called several times since morning, but none has appeared on behalf of complainant. It is already 04:00 P.M. Further wait is not justified. It appears that the complainant is not interested to pursue the present complaint. Accordingly, the present complaint is dismissed in default for want of prosecution. Certified copy of the order be sent to the parties concerned free of costs as per rules. File be indexed and consigned to record room.

Pronounced:-16.08.2022.

 

 

Member                         Member                                   President

  DCDRC, Ambala