Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/268/2019

S.Jayaraman Age 71, S/o Shanmuga Nadar, 6/125, 3rd street, B.M.Samy Colony, R.S.Puram, Kovai 641 002. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Department of Post Superintendent Coimbatore Division, Coimbatore 641 001. - Opp.Party(s)

PARTY IN PERSON

18 Nov 2021

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
First Appeal No. A/268/2019
( Date of Filing : 23 Sep 2019 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 07/08/2019 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/105/2015 of District Coimbatore)
 
1. S.Jayaraman Age 71, S/o Shanmuga Nadar, 6/125, 3rd street, B.M.Samy Colony, R.S.Puram, Kovai 641 002.
-
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Department of Post Superintendent Coimbatore Division, Coimbatore 641 001.
-
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESHWARI MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 18 Nov 2021
Final Order / Judgement

 STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

                 BEFORE   HON’BLE THIRU. JUSTICE. R. SUBBIAH                  ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                     Tmt.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI                              ::      MEMBER

 

FA. No. 268/2019

  (Against the order in C.C. No.108/2015, dated 7.8.2009 on the file of the DCDRC, Coimbatore )

                                                              DATED THIS THE 18th  DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021

 

S.JAYARAMAN,

Aged 72,

S/o Shanmuga Nadar,

6/124, 3rd street,

P.M.Samy Colony, R.S.Puram,

Coimbatore 641 002                                               ..Appellant/complainant

                                            Vs

Department of post –Superintendent

Coimbatore Division,

Coimbatore – 641 001                                            ..Respondent/opposite party

 

For Appellant                                   : S.Jayaraman,  Party in person           

Counsel for Respondent                    : M/s R.Kumar

 

          This appeal coming before us for hearing today, this commission made the following order in open court :-      

 

                                                    Docket order

 

          No representation for Appellant. This appeal is posted today for appearance of appellant and for filing written arguments of appellant and for arguments in list. When his matter was called at 11.00 A.M, there is no representation for the Appellant.  Hence the matter was passed over and again called at 1.00 noon, but the Appellant was again not present. Hence the appeal is dismissed for default.

                 Sd/-                                                                                               Sd/-

      S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                                                          R. SUBBIAH

               MEMBER                                                                                PRESIDENT

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESHWARI]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.