Maharashtra

DCF, South Mumbai

CC/63/2013

PARESH D.SHAH - Complainant(s)

Versus

DENA BANK, - Opp.Party(s)

A.D.PRADHAN

26 Sep 2013

ORDER

 
CC NO. 63 Of 2013
 
1. PARESH D.SHAH
103, RAMAS TOWER, S.N.ROAD, TAMBE NAGAR, MULUND(W), MUMBAI 400 080
2. VIMLA D. SHAH
59, GOA STREET, KAKKAL BUILDING , FORT, MUMBAI 400 001.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. DENA BANK,
DENA BANK HOUSE, 17, HARNIMAN CIRCLE, HAMAM STREET, FORT, MUMBAI 400 001.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'ABLE MR. Satyashil M. Ratnakar PRESIDENT
 HON'ABLE MR. G.H. Rathod MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
तक्रारदाराच्‍या वतीने वकील श्रीमती अर्पीता प्रधान हजर.
 ......for the Complainant
 
सामनेवालाचे वकील अनिता कांबळे यांचे वतीने वकील भावेश पुजारी हजर.
 ......for the Opp. Party
ORDER

Order  Below  Exhibit 1

 

 

PER SHRI. G.H. RATHOD - HON’BLE  MEMBER  :

            Read order passed below Misc. Application No.12/2013 filed for Condonation of Delay.

           The Complainants had filed an application for condonation of delay of near about 810 days caused in filing this complaint. The condonation of delay application is rejected. Therefore, this complaint is dismissed as barred by law of limitation.  No order as to cost.

 
 
[HON'ABLE MR. Satyashil M. Ratnakar]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'ABLE MR. G.H. Rathod]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.