Madhya Pradesh

StateCommission

FA/13/2316

UDAY CHELWANI - Complainant(s)

Versus

DELHIPUBLIC SCHOOL - Opp.Party(s)

17 Nov 2015

ORDER

         Shri S.P. Tiwari, learned counsel for the appellant.

         Shri Somendra Saxena, learned counsel for respondent no.1 and 2. 

        Heard.

        On perusal of the order of the District Consumer Forum, Rewa in case no. 179/12 dated 16.08.13 as also the record of the case.  The District Forum has in a very detailed and analytical way described the conditions under which the complaint of the appellant was dismissed.

          In paragraph 8 of the order of the District Forum, it has been clearly indicated that there is no evidence that the institution was not recognized at the time of admission of appellant.

           Heard arguments of both the counsels. 

           Counsel for the appellant could not submit  any  documents or  evidence  which proves that the educational institute was not recognized by the CBSE Board at the time of admission of appellant.

            In view of lack of evidence, we find that there is no merit in the appeal and the order passed by the District Forum has no infirmity and is up to the mark.

           This appeal is therefore, dismissed having no merit at all.   

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.