Delhi

Central Delhi

CC/42/2017

KIRAN SHARMA - Complainant(s)

Versus

DELHI JAL BOARD - Opp.Party(s)

11 Apr 2017

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/42/2017
 
1. KIRAN SHARMA
5787, NEAR JWAHAR NAGAR, NEW CHANDRAWAL , MALKA GANJ, DELHI.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. DELHI JAL BOARD
VARUNALYA, PHASE-11, KAROL BAGH, MDELHI-05.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. MOHD. ANWAR ALAM PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. VIKRAM KUMAR DABAS MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. MRS. MANJU BALA SHARMA MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 11 Apr 2017
Final Order / Judgement

ORDER                                                                                                                                                           Dated:  11-04-2017 

Mohd. Anwar Alam, President

 

   Present none for complainant since 03.03.2017, 16-03-2017, 29-03-2017  and today consecutively.  It appears  that complainant is not interested in pursuing her case. As the complaint is listed for consideration regarding maintainability of the complaint therefore perused allegations made in the complaint as well as the documents annexed with it.  Admittedly, complainant is user of water connection no. 3200401000 which was installed in the name of previous owner Sh. Rajender Kumar. The water bill annexed with the complaint related with this connection clarify that the category of the water connection is CAT-II. Hence the allegation of the complainant that she used the water connection in CAT-I is unfounded and baseless particularly in the absence  of any documentary evidence or affidavit of the previous owner Sh. Rajender Kumar. It is pertinent to mention herein that water bill CAT-II relates with the commercial connection  therefore CAT-II of the water connection cannot be treated as CAT-I as alleged by the complainant without any basis.

    Looking to the above facts and circumstances  we are of the considered opinion that  complainant is not a consumer under the provision of section 2 (i) (d) of the Consumer Protection  Act and as such  this complaint is not maintainable under the provision of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and dismissed accordingly. 

  Copy of this order be made available to the complainant free of cost as per law. File be consigned to record room.

Announced on this…………

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. MOHD. ANWAR ALAM]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. VIKRAM KUMAR DABAS]
MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MRS. MRS. MANJU BALA SHARMA]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.