Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/108/2014

M.V. SIVARAMAKRISHNAN - Complainant(s)

Versus

DEEPAM HOSPITAL LTD., MANAGING DIRECTOR - Opp.Party(s)

K. NANDHINI

28 Oct 2022

ORDER

                              STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

                                BEFORE    Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE  R. SUBBIAH           ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                                     Thiru.R.VENKATESA PERUMAL                     ::      MEMBER

 

 CC. No. 108/2014

 

                                                        DATED THIS THE 28^th  DAY OF OCTOBER 2022

 

M.V.Sivaramakrishnan,

Plot No.17, Door No.13/11,

V.P. Kattabomman street,

Chitlapakkam,

Chennai 600 064                                                       ..Complainant

                                              Vs

1.Deepam Hospital Ltd,

Rep.by its Managing Director,

Nehru Nagar,

Chrompet, Chennai 600 044          

 

2. Dr.Viswanathan,

Deepam Hospital Ltd,

No.30, Ayyasami street,

Nehru Nagar,

Chrompet, Chennai 600 044          

 

3. Deepam Hospital Ltd,

Rep.by its Managing Director,

No.327, Muthurangam street,

West Tambaram,

Chennai 600 045

 

4. Dr.T.N.Ravi Shankar,

.Deepam Hospital Ltd,

No.327, Muthurangam street,

West Tambaram,

Chennai 600 045

 

5. Dr.V.S.Hariharan,

Deepam Hospital Ltd,

No.30, Ayyasami street,

Nehru Nagar,

Chrompet, Chennai 600 044          

 

 6. Dr.M.Nandhakumar

Deepam Hospital Ltd,

No.327, Muthurangam street,

West Tambaram,

Chennai 600 045                                    

 

7. Dr.L.Sankaranarayanan,

Deepam Hospital Ltd,

No.327, Muthurangam street,

West Tambaram,

Chennai 600 045                                                     ..opposite parties

 

Counsel for the complainant                            : M/s K.Nandhini

Counsel for the opposite parties 1 to 7             : M/s AAV Partners

 

       This complaint is coming on before us for hearing today, this commission made the following order in open court :-

                                                      Docket order

      No representation for complainant. Opposite parties present and ready. This complaint is posted today for appearance of complainant and for arguments in list or for dismissal. Though several opportunities given, the complainant has continuously absent, hence this commission directed to Registry on 28.9.2022, to send notice to the complainant for his appearance. Notice sent, cover returned as ‘BUC’. When the matter was called at 11.00 A.M, the complainant was not present hence, passed over and called again at 12.30 noon, then also the complainant has not appeared. Hence we are of the view that keeping the complaint pending is of no use as the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case. The complaint is dismissed for default. No order as to cost.

Sd/-                                                                                                              Sd/-

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                R.SUBBIAH

MEMBER                                                                                               PRESIDENT