Delhi

West Delhi

CC/16/698

RAHUL CHOUDHARY - Complainant(s)

Versus

DEEP HYUNDAI - Opp.Party(s)

05 Dec 2022

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION-III,

WEST DISTRICT, C-150-151, COMMUNITY CENTRE, JANAKPURI,

NEW DELHI

 

CC 698/2016

 

Rahul Choudhary

S/o Sh. Shamsher Singh

Flat No.25, Pocket D, Keshavkunj Apartments

Sector 17, Dwarka,

New Delhi-110078                                                                       ……..Complainant  

 

VERSUS

M/s Deep Hyundai

1K-1, Udyog Nagar Industrial Area, New Rohtak Road,

Peeragarhi, New Delhi-110041

                                                .........Opposite Party

 

CORAM:

Ms. Sonica Mehrotra, President

Ms. Richa Jindal, Member

Mr. Anil Kumar Koushal, Member

Present: Mr. Shamsher Singh, father of complainant                                                       05.12.2022

           

            We find from the record that written arguments on behalf  of OP despite grant of various opportunities have not been filed.  Accordingly the right of OP to file written arguments is struck off.  During final arguments, father of the complainant revealed that the vehicle in question has already been sold about two years back.  

We may  here refer to the  judgment   of the Hon’ble National Commission in the case of Tata Motors Ltd Vs. Hazoor Maharaj  Baba Des Rajji Chela Baba Dewan Singhji, 2013 SCC Online NCDRC 883 wherein  it was held that since the complainant has sold the vehicle, the complaint is rendered infructuous as the complainant is no more a consumer. 

Having gone through the judgment referred to above, the complaint is dismissed as infructuous. File be consigned to record room.

 

 (Richa Jindal)                           (Anil Kumar Koushal)                                            (Sonica Mehrotra)

    Member                                       Member                                                                 President