West Bengal

Hooghly

CC/13/2020

Smt Puspita Sarkar - Complainant(s)

Versus

das Construction - Opp.Party(s)

Isita Chatterjee

01 Oct 2021

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HOOGHLY
CC OF 2021
PETITIONER
VERS
OPPOSITE PARTY
 
Complaint Case No. CC/13/2020
( Date of Filing : 17 Feb 2020 )
 
1. Smt Puspita Sarkar
109 Nabin Pally, Morpukur, 712250
Hooghly
West bengal
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. das Construction
8/2 das para Lane, Morpukur, Rishra, 712250
Hooghly
West bengal
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. Smt. Devi Sengupta PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Sri Samaresh Kr. Mitra MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 01 Oct 2021
Final Order / Judgement

Order no.  12, dt. 1.10.2021

Complainant is absent without steps.

It appears from the case record that the complainant namely Smt. Pushpa Sarkar filed a complaint before this Commission against the ops praying directions as incorporated in the prayer portion of the complaint petition and on the basis of that complaint petition a C.C. case being no. 13 of 2020 being instituted vide order dt. 17.02.2020. it is pertinent to that the complainant during the period of filing filed a demand draft of Rs. 200/- being no. 895226 dt. 14.02.2020 of SBI, Serampore Branch.

 During the period of lockdown the Registrar-in-charge could not send the above noted bank draft to the concerned bank branch due to shortage of staff as a result the said bank draft became stale. So, this Commission vide its order dt. 8.12.2020 directed the complainant to take back the original bank draft and to file a fresh draft by next date but the complainant since 1.10.2020 is absent without steps. A several adjournments granted for filing a fresh draft but the complainant bothered to take any steps on that score.

As a result this Commission is in the opinion to dismiss the above noted C.C. case for non prosecution as the complainant is not interested to proceed the case and in the same parlance the Registrar-in-charge is also directed to be cautious enough for encashing such draft as early as possible so that no such occurrence may take place in further.

Hence ordered that the C.C. case being no. 13 of 2020 be and the same is dismissed due to non prosecution.

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Smt. Devi Sengupta]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri Samaresh Kr. Mitra]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.