Maharashtra

Central Mumbai

CC/13/193

Mr. Behrm Manchersha Daruwala - Complainant(s)

Versus

Dadar Maish market Co-Op.Society Ltd: Ors - Opp.Party(s)

28 Nov 2013

ORDER

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CENTRAL MUMBAI DISTRICT.
Puravatha Bhavan, 2nd floor, Gen. Nagesh Marg, Nr. Mahatma Gandhi Hospital, Parel, Mumbai-12.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/13/193
 
1. Mr. Behrm Manchersha Daruwala
Shop No.F/50,Dadar Maish Market-Co-Op. Society Ltd Senapati Bapat Marg, Dadar(W)Mumbai-400028
Mumbai
maharashtra
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Dadar Maish market Co-Op.Society Ltd: Ors
Senapati Bapat Marg, Dadar(W) Mumbai-400028
Mumbai
Maharashtra
2. Mr.Arun Khaturia Chairman,F/97
Dadar Maish Market Co-Op.Society Ltd:Senapati Bapat Marg, Dadar(W) Mumbai-400028
Mumbai
Maharashtra
3. Mr.Harmeetsingh H. Gulati, Treasurer,F/128
Dadar Maish Market Co-Op. Society Ltd: Senapati Bapat Marg, Dadar (W) Mumbai-400028
Mumbai
Maharashtra
4. Mr Mukesh M.Chugh Secretary,F/59
Dadar Maish Market Co-Op. Society Ltd: Senapati Bapat Marg, Dadar (W) Mumbai-400028
Mumbai
Maharashtra
5. Mr. Jayantilal R.Shah Committee Member,G107
Dadar Maish Market Co-Op. Society Ltd: Senapati Bapat Marg, Dadar (W) Mumbai-400028
Mumbai
Maharashtra
6. Mr.Suresh T. Rohra,Committee Member G-116
Dadar Maish Market Co-Op. Society Ltd: Senapati Bapat Marg, Dadar (W) Mumbai-400028
Mumbai
Maharashtra
7. Mr. Indermeetsingh H. Gulati, Committee Member,F-126
Dadar Maish Market Co-Op. Society Ltd: Senapati Bapat Marg, Dadar (W) Mumbai-400028
Mumbai
Maharashtra
8. Mr. Hemant K. Lakhwani, Committee Member,F-008
Dadar Maish Market Co-Op. Society Ltd: Senapati Bapat Marg, Dadar (W) Mumbai-400028
Mumbai
Maharashtra
9. Mr.Anil K. Bhagnani, Committee,Member,G-33
Dadar Maish Market Co-Op. Society Ltd: Senapati Bapat Marg, Dadar (W) Mumbai-400028
Mumbai
Maharashtra
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'ABLE MR. B.S.WASEKAR PRESIDENT
 HON'ABLE MR. H.K.BHAISE MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
Mr.Vijay Patil, Adv. for the Complainant
Complainant also present in person
 
 
ORDER

Per Mr.B.S.Wasekar, Hon’ble President

Heard Mr.Vijay Patil, the learned advocate for the complainant. Complainant is also present. As per para 8, 10 & 11 of the complaint, the complainant had already approached the Assistant Registrar, who is the competent authority to give relief to the complainant and the Assistant Registrar had already passed the order. The complainant has filed this complaint for the same relief again. It is true that additional remedy is there to the complainant under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 but the complainant has approached this Forum when the matter already decided by the competent authority. The complainant can execute the order of the Assistant Registrar through proper channel as per the provisions. Once the order is there, he can not file this complaint again for the same relief or for the execution of the order of the competent authority. The complaint is not maintainable. Hence, the complaint stands dismissed at the stage of admission itself.

 
 
[HON'ABLE MR. B.S.WASEKAR]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'ABLE MR. H.K.BHAISE]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.