Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/104/2017

Anbu Ilango Siva, Managing Director - Complainant(s)

Versus

D.Sri Jaya Durga - Opp.Party(s)

G.K.Uthira Nihila Kumar

25 Feb 2022

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

                   BEFORE   Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE. R. SUBBIAH                  ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                      Tmt.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI                            ::      MEMBER

 

FA. No. 104/2017

  (Against the order in C.C. No.27/2014, dated 12.10.2015 on the file of the DCDRC, Chengalpattu)

                                                     DATED THE 25^th DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022

 

Anbu Ilango Siva,

Managing Director,

Mangalam constructions,

No.5, Saraswathy street,

Gurusamy Nagar Extn.,

Gowrivakkam, Chennai 600 073                                          ..Appellant/opposite party

 

                                  Vs

D.Sri Jaya Durga,

w/o Raja Vijayaraghavan,

Flat No.2B, II Floor,

No.5/4B, Sangothi Amman Kovil 5^th street,

Sembakkam, Chennai – 600 073                                                        ..Respondent /complainant

 

Counsel for the appellant/opposite party            : M/s G.K.Uthra Nihila kumari

 Respondent                                                               : Served called absent

 

          This appeal coming on before us for hearing today for appearance of appellant and for filing written argument of appellant and for arguments (list) or for dismissal, this commission made the following order in open court :-

 

                                                   Docket order

          No representation for appellant. Respondent served called absent. This appeal is posted today for appearance of appellant and for filing written arguments of appellant and for arguments in list or for dismissal.  When the matter was called at 11.00 A.M, the appellant has not present, hence passed over and called again at 12.15 noon, then also the appellant has not appeared. Hence we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case. The appeal is dismissed for default. No order as to cost.

 

      Sd/-                                                                                                              Sd/-

S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI                                                                         R. SUBBIAH             

          MEMBER                                                                                             PRESIDENT