Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/39/2014

Aishwar Muthuraman - Complainant(s)

Versus

D.Dinakaran & another - Opp.Party(s)

S.K.Srinivasan

25 Aug 2022

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/39/2014
( Date of Filing : 29 Apr 2014 )
 
1. Aishwar Muthuraman
No.81, Mike Myers Dr,Toronto,Canada MIP 5G3
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. D.Dinakaran & another
Teynampet,Chennai-18.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. S.KARUPPIAH JUDICIAL MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 25 Aug 2022
Final Order / Judgement

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

                               BEFORE    Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE  R. SUBBIAH           ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                                    Thiru.S.KARUPPIAH                                       ::  JUDICIAL  MEMBER

 

 CC. No. 39/2014

                                                                        DATED THIS THE 25th  DAY OF AUGUST 2022

 

Shri.Aishwar Muthuraman,

No.81, Mike Myers Dr.

Toronto, Ontario, Canada MIP 503                                          ..complainant

 

                                                   Vs

 

1. D.Dinakaran

Proprietor M/s Green Avenue Homes & Gardens,

No.39-C, Second Floor, K.B.Dasan street,

Teynampet, Chennai – 18

 

 

2.Bennett Property Holding company Limited,

Aartha Properties,

Represented by its authorizing Signatory,

Mr.Suresh Rangarajan,

Having office at Artha Tower,

2nd Floor, Door No. 167-169,

Anna Salai, Saidapet, Chennai 600 015                  ..opposite party

(Amended as per order dated 7.10.2015 in MP.No. 364/2014)

 

For the complainant                                          : Party in person

Counsel for the 2nd opposite party                       : M/s Tatva Legal Chennai

1st opposite party                                              : Exparte

 

          This complaint is coming on before us for hearing today this commission made the following order in open court :-

 

                                                  Docket order

 

          No representation for complainant. Opposite party present. Ready. This complaint is posted today for appearance of complainant and to amend the cause title and to file clean copy of complaint or for dismissal. When the matter was called at 11.00 A.M, the complainant was not present hence, passed over and called again at 12.40 noon, then also the complainant has not appeared. Though sufficient time granted steps not taken to amend the cause title till date. Hence we are of the view that keeping the complaint pending is of no use as the complainant is not interested in

prosecuting the case. The complaint is dismissed for default. No order as to cost.

   Sd/-                                                                                                                Sd/-                           

S.KARUPPIAH                                                                                          R.SUBBIAH

JUDL.MEMBER                                                                                         PRESIDENT

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. S.KARUPPIAH]
JUDICIAL MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.