Haryana

StateCommission

A/675/2018

DR. NIRDOSH KUMAR BHARDWAJ - Complainant(s)

Versus

CRONY ACCESSORIES - Opp.Party(s)

VED PRIYA MALIK

07 Nov 2024

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA

 

                                                         

                                                          Date of Institution: 23.05.2018

                                                          Date of final hearing: 07.11.2024

                                                          Date of Pronouncement: 07.11.2024

 

 

FIRST APPEAL NO.675 OF 2018

 

IN THE MATTER OF

 

Dr. Nirdosh Kumar Bhardwaj aged about 57 years S/o Shri Prem Pal Bhardwaj, R/o H.No.1197, Sector-27, Panchkula-134109.

 

 

                                      …. Appellant

Versus

 

1. Crony Accessories, shop No.308, SCO-46, Canam Plaza Sector-11, Panchkula.
2. Ambika Enterprises through its Proprietor, SCO-42, Sector-11, Panchkula 134109.
3. H.T.C. Pvt. Ltd. through its Managing Director, having its registered office at G-4/B P.T.P. Bark Centre, Sector 30, near NH 8, Gurgaon.
4. T.V.S.E Chandigarh authorized service centre for HTC, SCO No.103, Ground Floor, Sector 47-C, Chandigarh.

 …. Respondents

 

 

         

CORAM:   mR. s.p. sood, judicial member 

                   MS. MANJULA, MEMBER                               

                                  

Present:     None for the appellant.

                   None for respondents No.1 and 4.

                   Respondent No.2 already proceeded against ex parte.

                   Presence of respondent No.3 already dispensed with.

 

 

 

 

PER: S.P. SOOD, JUDICIAL MEMBER

 

 

 

 

ORDER

 

 

 

 

 

1. This complainant’s appeal is directed against the order dated 11.04.2018 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Panchkula whereby the complaint was dismissed being devoid of any merit.
2. Case called several times since morning but none has appeared on behalf of appellant. In fact it is for the last eight consecutive occasions whenever this appeal was fixed for hearings, also nobody has appeared on behalf of appellant. It appears that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the appeal. It is already 4:00 P.M. No more wait is justified. Therefore, appeal is dismissed in default for want of prosecution.   
3. A copy of this order be provided to all the parties free of cost as mandated by the Consumer Protection Act. The order be uploaded forthwith on the website of the Commission for the perusal of the parties.
4. File be consigned to record room along with a copy of this order.

 

 

 

 

 

(S.P. SOOD)

JUDICIAL MEMBER

 

 

(MANJULA)

MEMBER

 

Pronounced on: 07.11.2024

MS