Date of Filing: 08-05-2018
Date of Order:27 -02-2020
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM – I, HYDERABAD
P r e s e n t
HON’BLE Sri P.VIJENDER, B.Sc. L.L.B., PRESIDENT
HON’BLE Sri K.RAM MOHAN, B.Sc. M.A L.L.B., MALE MEMBER
HON’BLE Smt. CH. LAKSHMI PRASANNA, B.Sc. LLM.,(PGD (ADR) LADY MEMBER
Thursday, the 27th day of February, 2020
C.C.No.201 /2018
Between
Cinimol Joseph, W/o.Lins Thomas,
Aged about 38 years, Occ: Teacher,
R/o.Varukuzhiyil (H), Oliyappuram (P.O),
Moovattupuzha, Ernakulam District -686662,
Kerala …… Complainant
And
Country Vacations,
Represented by Manager,
S.Ravinder,
At: Corporate Office: Country Club Kool,
#6-3-1219, 4th floor,
Begumpet, Hyderabad- 500016 ….Opposite Party
Counsel for the complainant : Mr.B.Sri Kiran
Counsel for the opposite Party : Mr.V.Sreenivasa Rao
O R D E R
(By Sri P. Vijender, B.Sc., LL.B., President on behalf of the bench)
This complaint has been preferred under Section 12 of C.P. Act 1986 alleging that refusal to refund the amount collected from the complainant towards house plot and membership fee in the club amounts to unfair trade practice and deficiency of service , hence a direction for refund of the same and to award compensation for causing mental agony by not refunding the same.
- Complainant’s case in brief is that in the month of January 2017 the representative of opposite party approached the complainant and offered to allot a plot admeasuring 150 Sq.yards being developed in the business venture of opposite party if complainant becomes member of it by paying a sum of Rs.2,50,000/- towards membership fee. Believing the same complainant paid Rs.2,50,000/- and on payment of it the complainant was given Thumbs up Silver membership. After enrolling as a member in the opposite party club the complainant enquired about the allotment of plot promised, then she was informed that amount paid by her is only for membership and she needs to pay further sum of Rs.55,000/- for allotment of the plot in her name and she has to wait for a few more months. Later she was shown lay out situate at far away from Hyderabad city. The complainant was not happy about the location of the plot as it is far from city and there is no development in that area. When she was enrolled as a member the opposite party’s executives informed that the allotment of the plot will be at prime location and by not keeping up the promise and offering the plot at remote place without any development amounts to unfair trade practice. The efforts made by the complainant and her husband to prevail upon the opposite party to allot the plot at a good location as promised earlier was resulted in vain. Since the opposite party has not come forward to allot the plot at prime location as offered earlier she sought for refund of the amount, but there was no response. By not allotting the plot at developed area and refusal to refund the amount collected from her, the opposite party subjected her to inconvenience and harassment and it amounts to deficiency in service. Hence the present complaint for a direction to opposite party to refund the amount of Rs.2,50,000/- with interest at 12% P.A from the date of the complaint to the date of payment and to award a compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- for causing mental agony and cost of the complaint.
- The stand of the opposite party in the written version is that the complainant after knowing the terms and conditions of the scheme of membership signed purchased Vacations agreement on 12-2-2017 and paid a sum of Rs.2,50,000/- out of total amount of Rs.2,70,000/- leaving an amount of Rs.20,000/-as due . As per the terms of membership agreement signed and executed by the complainant the amount paid towards membership fee is non-refundable. Hence the complainant cannot seek refund of the same. The complainant was already issued membership card enabling her to enjoy the facilities available in the club of the opposite party subject to terms and conditions of membership. Since the membership agreement is a written contract between the parties the complainant cannot unilaterally seek termination of it. It is up to the complainant to utilize the facilities and benefits available with the opposite party club. The complainant as a member is entitled benefits of stay for a period of six nights and seven days per year at the properties of it within India by advancedly booking.
The complainant was offered a plot in a project known as “Sagar Sundarvan” situate at Nalgonda District and she needs to pay an amount of Rs.59,000/- towards registration stamp duty and development charges but she failed to pay the said amount within the stipulated period and she has shown dis-interest for registering the plot in her favour. The claim of the complainant that she was offered a house plot in the prime location is absolutely false. It will be impossible to get plot in a prime location with the offered price. The complainant has to pay the balance amount of Rs.20,000/- towards plot and Rs.59,000/- for development charges and registration expenses and the opposite party would have allotted the plot in the project known as Sagar Sundarvan if she paid the same. The question of non-allotment of plot in prime area infavour of the complainant does not arise. The complainant has not paid Annual maintenance charges to the club as a member and failure on the part to utilize the facilities available at the club does not amount deficiency of service or unfair trade practice towards the complainant. The present complaint is devoid of cause of action, hence the complainant is not entitled for any amount and the complaint is liable to be dismissed with exemplary costs.
In the enquiry the complainant has got filed her evidence affidavit reiterating the material facts of the complaint and to support the same she got exhibited three (3) documents. For the Opposite Party evidence affidavit of its legal Manager is got filed and substance of the same is in line with the stand taken in the written version. Two (2) documents are exhibited for the opposite party. Both sides have filed written arguments and made oral submissions.
On a consideration of the material brought on the record for both sides the following points have emerged for consideration :
- Whether the complainant could make out a case of either unfair trade practice or deficiency in service on the part of the opposite party?
- Whether the complainant is entitled for the amounts claimed in the complaint?
- To what relief?
Point No.1: In the light of the admission made by the opposite party that an amount of Rs.2,50,000/- was collected from the complainant towards membership fee and offering club facilities subject to payment of Annual maintenance charges and offer of house plot subject to payment of further amounts towards registration and another expenses to the plot no further enquiry on this aspect from this Forum is needed. Ex.A1 is the original receipt evidencing payment of Rs.2,50,000/- by the complainant through the credit card. As per this receipt an amount of Rs.2,70,000/- is required to be paid to become a member and since the complainant paid only Rs.2,50,000/- and an amount of Rs.20,000/- is due from the complainant side. This Ex.A1 receipt does not contain terms and conditions to become a member of the opposite party club. The amounts paid by the complainant to the opposite party was during the period from 17-2-2017 to 9-4-2017. Ex.A2 is stated to be membership enrollment letter issued by the opposite party. This letter also does not contain terms and conditions to become a member of the opposite party club. It only refers about the total amount payable to become a member and amount paid by the complainant and the balance payable by her. However there is a mention that the complainant as a member is entitled the facility of stay of six (6) nights and seven (7) days at the property owned by the opposite party club for five(5) years subject to payment of annual maintenance charges. There is no mention of allotment of plot or its location. Ex.A3 is the so called purchase agreement for club and vacations membership signed by the complainant on 12-2-2017. This purchase agreement contains terms and conditions between the parties in relation to club membership sale agreement. As already said the amount paid by the complainant as per Ex.A1 receipt was dt.17-02-2017 to 9-4-2017 whereas Ex.A3 membership agreement is dated 12-2-2017 by which date admittedly the complainant has not paid the amount. So it is evident that without receiving any amount she was made to sign on Ex.A3 agreement.
The stand of the opposite party is as per the terms and conditions incorporated in the Ex.A3 agreement the amount paid towards membership agreement is non-refundable and complainant being a signatory of it is bound by there terms as such cannot seek refund of the amount paid. The opposite party has not filed the evidence affidavit of the person who signed Ex.A3 agreement on its behalf stating that the complainant was either explained the terms and conditions incorporated in Ex.A3 agreement or she has gone through them before signing it. As could be seen from written version and evidence affidavit filed for opposite party they are not signed by the same person. The signatory of Ex.A3 on behalf of opposite party is not the same person who signed Ex.A2 filed for opposite party. Hence it is not open for opposite party to say that the complainant having agreed for terms and conditions signed Ex.A3. There is an annexure in Ex.A3 agreement containing as many as ten clauses out of them only four are filled leaving rest as blank. Clause 8 deals that the name of the venture and area of the plot offered and location of the venture. Only blank relating to number of Sq.yards of the plot is filled as 150 Sq.yards offered to the complainant. The blank relating to the venture and its location are not filled up. Similarly name of the member who paid the amount and signed Ex.A3 agreement is not filled up similarly membership number and date column’s are also not filled up and left blank. So it is evident that the complainant was not informed either location or name of the venture from which the house plot was offered without disclosing these important aspects the opposite party cannot plead that the complainant was aware of not only terms and conditions of membership agreement but also the location and name of the venture from which she was offered house plot. Collecting the huge amount of Rs.2,50,000/- under the guise of allotment of plot on becoming a member of club in a venture agreed to be developed by the opposite party certainly amounts to unfair trade practice.
Now coming to the aspect of the clause relating to non-refundable of amount paid as per membership fee admittedly even as on today the complainant was not provided with any services by the opposite party. Even according to the opposite party complainant did not come forward to avail any facilities at club so as to say that the amount cannot be refunded to the complainant. Under the guise of a non-refundable clause the opposite party cannot be allowed to enrich itself with the amount collected from the complainant. The very collection of the amount from complainant by opposite party by offering house plot without disclosing the name of the venture or its location itself amounts to unfair trade practice and refusal to refund the amount when the complainant has not agreed for location of the venture in which a plot was offered amounts to subjecting her to the harassment. Accordingly point is answered infavour of the complainant.
Point No.2: In view of the findings of this Forum that the opposite party collected huge amount of Rs.2,50,000/- from the complainant on the guise of allotment of house plot after becoming a member and failure to allot the plot at the promised location amounts to unfair trade practice and refusal to refund the amount when sought for amounts to deficiency of service. Hence the complainant is entitled for the reliefs sought for.
Point No.3: In the result, the complaint is allowed in part directing the opposite party
- To refund an amount of Rs.2,50,000/- to the complainant with interest at 12% P.A from the date of complaint to the date of payment.
- To pay a sum of Rs.50,000/- towards compensation for causing inconvenience and mental agony by not refunding the amount
- To pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- towards cost of this complaint.
Time for compliance: One month from the date of service of this order
Dictated to steno, transcribed and typed by her, pronounced by us on this the 27th day of February , 2020.
LADYMEMBER MALEMEMBER PRESIDENT
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
Exs. filed on behalf of the Complainant:
Ex.A1- copy of receipt ( transaction details)
Ex.A2- copy of the club membership enrollment letter issued by the opposite party
Ex.A3- copy of purchase agreement for club and vacations membership dt.12-02-2017
Exs. filed on behalf of the Opposite party
Ex.B1- Welcome call CD
Ex.B2- Membership and Vacation agreement
LADYMEMBER MALEMEMBER PRESIDENT