West Bengal

Kolkata-I(North)

CC/92/2015

Sima Banerjee and Susanta Kr. Banerjee - Complainant(s)

Versus

Country Vacations and 2 others - Opp.Party(s)

23 Aug 2017

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kolkata - I (North)
8B, Nelie Sengupta Sarani, 4th Floor, Kolkata-700087.
Web-site - confonet.nic.in
 
Complaint Case No. CC/92/2015
 
1. Sima Banerjee and Susanta Kr. Banerjee
30, Khetra Mohan Banerjee Lane, P.S. - Shibpur, Howrah - 711102.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Country Vacations and 2 others
(A Division of Country Club(India)), 86B/2, 1st Floor, Topsia Road, Gajraj Chamber, P.S. - Topsia, Kolkata - 700046.
2. City Centre - I
Block - C, 3rd Floor, Shop no. - 303, Salt Lake, Sector - I, Kolkata - 700064.
3. Country Vacations, Division of Country Club (India) Ltd.
Amrutha Castle, 5-9-16, Saifabad, Opp. Secretariat, Hyderabad - 500063.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Sambhunath Chatterjee PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Sk. Abul Answar MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 23 Aug 2017
Final Order / Judgement

Order No.  16  dt.  23/08/2017

The case of the complainant in brief is that the complainant and his  wife entered into an agreement on 10.05.2015 with country vacation, a division of M/s Country Club India Ltd to avail vacation benefits (short term, periodic in every year and specific scheduled programme) at CCIL’s affiliated property of hospitality/resort with a consideration of Rs.1,50,000/- as product price. Complainant had also been motivated to avail the opportunity of Club membership with the promise of reward. A team of the o.p. promised the complainant to have a trip to Bangkok/Dubai as a complementary one. Accordingly complainant paid Rs.1,00,000/- by ATM, Rs.10,000/- in cash and Rs 40,000/- in cheque  on 10.01.2015. Incidentally, complainant came to know the fraudulent business practice of the company on the very next day i.e. on 11.07.2015.and they, somehow, managed to cancel the cheque of Rs 40,000/-. On 15.01.2015 complainant apprised their unwillingness to go with the Country Club India Ltd according to the agreement dated 10.01.2015 and also visited the office of the o.p. on 16.01.2015 for refund of the deposited money of Rs.1,10,000/- O.P summarily rejected the new proposal of refunding their money. Complainant being dissatisfied  with the subsequent action of the o.p. regarding refund of money they already deposited for membership and vacation trip took shelter of section-12 of C.P.Act, 1986 seeking direction for return of Rs1,10,000/- along with  interest,  and compensation of Rs50,000/- for harassment & mental agony and litigation cost of Rs5,000/-.

O.p appeared before this Forum and contested the case by filing written version. In their w/v o.p denied all material allegations. Complainant entered into an agreement with the o.ps after going through the terms and conditions of the said agreement and put signature there on without any coercion. Identity cards were issued with receipt. Hence, the allegation of cheating/UTP had no base at all. Complainant did not make any attempt to avail the benefits to be provided in the agreement dated 10.01.2015 and therefore the allegation of deficiency in service/UTP was the afterthought of the complainant, which deserved to be dismissed with exemplary cost.

On the basis of the pleading of the parties the following points are to be decided :

  1. Whether there was any deficiency in service o the part of the o.p.
  2. Whether the complainant will be entitled to get any relief as prayed for.

Decision with reasons

All the points are taken up together for the sake of brevity and avoidance of repetition of facts.

                        Considering the submission of the respective parties and for the series of cases filed against the o.p. it is found that the same allegations have been leveled against the o.p. that they camouflaged the parties by offering different places with allurement of providing accommodation without payment of any charges . O.p. also forced the parties to sign the agreement by creating such an atmosphere that if the membership is not accepted immediately in that event all the offers to be provided by the o.p. could not be availed of by the parties. O.p. allured the complainants that they would enjoy the hassle free benefits offered in the agreement.

  Complainant paid Rs.1,10,000/- on 10.01.2015. Being apprised of the fraudulent  practice of the company  complainant informed their unwillingness to the agreement dated 10.01.2015 and submitted letter regarding refund of money they already deposited for membership and vacation trip. Being frustrated by the activities of the o.p. and finding no other alternative complainants had to file the instant case. Therefore, we hold that there was unfair trade practice on the part of the o.p. and the complainants will be entitled to get  relief.

            Hence, ordered

            That the case no.92/2015 is allowed on contest with cost.

           O.ps are directed to refund of Rs.1,10,000/- (Rupees one lakh ten thousand) only to the complainant along with  compensation  of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) only and litigation cost of Rs.3,000/-. O.ps are also directed to pay the aforesaid amount within 30 days from the date of communication of this order i.d., an interest @ 10% p.a. shall accrue over the entire sum due to the credit of the complainant till full realization.

           Supply certified copy of this order to the parties free of cost. 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sambhunath Chatterjee]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sk. Abul Answar]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.