View 1782 Cases Against Country Club
View 1782 Cases Against Country Club
MINNI ROHATGI filed a consumer case on 13 Mar 2020 against COUNTRY CLUB in the East Delhi Consumer Court. The case no is CC/398/2017 and the judgment uploaded on 16 Jul 2020.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM, EAST, Govt of NCT Delhi
CONVENIENT SHOPPING CENTRE, 1st FLOOR, SAINI ENCLAVE,DELHI 110092
Consumer complaint no.398/2017
Date of Institution 19/09/2017
Order Reserved on 13/03/2020
Date of Order 16/03/2020
In matter of
Mrs. Minni Rohtagi
w/o Mr Rajiv Rohtagi
R/o- 40, Deshbandhu Apartments
I P Extn.Patpargunj Delhi 110092 ……………....…………….….Complainant
Vs
The Manager,
Country Club, 2nd Floor, V3S Mall,
opp. Nirman Vihar Metro Station,
Vikas Marg, Delhi 110092 …………………….…………………..….Opponent
Complainant’s Advocate Mr Rajesh Sharma
Opponent Ex Parte
Quorum Sukhdev Singh President
Dr P N Tiwari Member
Mrs Harpreet Kaur Member
Order by Dr P N Tiwari Member
Brief Facts of the case
This complaint has been filed by the complainant under section 12 of C P Act, 1986 r/w sub section 2(1)(g) for deficiency in services against OP providing enjoyment trips to their customers by giving Membership.
The complainant after receiving welcome call from OP for offering AMC for 30 years plan for enjoying holidays anywhere complainant wishes to go and also offered to renew plan after complainant’s son turn 25 years of age. The AMC plan was Rs 10,500/-for every year. OP after negotiation offered Rs 1,50,000/-as membership where a sum of Rs 50,000/-paid in cash (Ex CW1/1) and cheque of Rs 0ne lakh was given as cheque no. 488977 on dated 30/06/2017.
It was stated that seeing different terms and conditions as agreed under contract of agreement (Ex CW1/2,3,4,4 A to C), sent email for refund of total amount paid Rs 1,50,000/-(Ex CW1/5 A to I). When no reply was received, filed this complaint for refund of his membership fee as Rs 50,000/-paid as cash with 24% interest from the date of payment and return of cheque of Rs one lakh with Rs 2 lakhs compensation for harassment and mental agony and Rs 25,000/- as litigation charges.
Even after receiving notices, OP did not put appearance so preceded Ex-Parte. Complainant filed Ex-Parte evidences on affidavit. Evidences were not controverted so presumed to be correct.
Arguments heard from counsel of complainant and after perusing facts and evidences in complaint, order was reserved.
We have seen that complainant had paid amount Rs. 50,000/-in cash as a part of contract of agreement for membership, but OP did not offer any services or gave holiday packages nor refunded amount despite of intimating OP. Certainly it amounts to deficiency in services. Hence complainant has proved deficiency of OP. As OP were Ex Parte and evidences on affidavit were not controverted, so we allow this complaint and pass the following order-
The first free copy of this order be sent to the parties as per the Regulations and file be consigned to the record room.
(Dr) P N Tiwari Member Mrs Harpreet Kaur Member
Sukhdev Singh, President
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.