NCDRC

NCDRC

FA/568/2014

SATISH KAKRI - Complainant(s)

Versus

CONTINENTAL CARRIER LTD. & ANR. - Opp.Party(s)

IN PERSON

07 Mar 2019

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
FIRST APPEAL NO. 568 OF 2014
 
(Against the Order dated 24/07/2014 in Complaint No. 275/1998 of the State Commission Maharashtra)
1. SATISH KAKRI
CARRYING ON BUSINESS IN THE NAME AND STYLE OF M/S. VIBHA FASHIONS, AS SOLE PROPRIETOR THEREOF HAVING HIS OFFICE AT 318, TULSIANI CHAMBER NARIMAN POINT,
MUMBAI-400021
MAHARSHTRA
...........Appellant(s)
Versus 
1. CONTINENTAL CARRIER LTD. & ANR.
A COMPAY REGISTERED UNDER PROVISION OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING THEIR OFFICE AT ROY APARTMENTS, G-F 1, SAHAR, ANDHERI (EAST)
MUMBAI-400099
MAHARASTRA.
2. IRAN AIRLINES, THE AIRLINE OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN,
HAVING THEIR OFFICE AT IRAN AIR BUILDING, MEHRABAD AIRPORT, TEHRAN, IRAN AND CARRYING ON BUSINESS AT SUNDER MAHAL MARINE-DRIVE,
MUMBAI-400 020
MAHARASHTRA
...........Respondent(s)
FIRST APPEAL NO. 1094 OF 2014
 
(Against the Order dated 24/07/2014 in Complaint No. 275/1998 of the State Commission Maharashtra)
1. IRAN AIRLINES
Sudar Mahal, Marine Drive
Mumbai - 400 099
Maharashtra
...........Appellant(s)
Versus 
1. SATISH KAKRI & ANR.
Sole Prop. Vibha Fashions, 318, Tulsiani Chambers, Nariman Point
Mumbai - 400 021
Maharashtra
2. Contenental Carriers Ltd.
Roy Apartments, G-F1, Sahar, Andheri (East), Mumbai - 400 099.
...........Respondent(s)
FIRST APPEAL NO. 1453 OF 2014
 
(Against the Order dated 24/07/2014 in Complaint No. 275/1998 of the State Commission Maharashtra)
1. M/S. CONTINENTAL CARRIER LTD.
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT: H-37, CONNAUGHT PLACE,
NEW DELHI-110001
...........Appellant(s)
Versus 
1. SATISH KAKRI & ANR.
SOLE PROPREITOR OF VIBHA FASHIONS, 318, TULSIAN CHAMBERS, NARIMAN POINT,
MUMBAI-400020
MAHARASHTRA
2. IRAN AIRLINES,
SUDAR MAHAL, MARINE DRIVE,
MUMBAI-400020
MAHARASHTRA
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN,PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. DR. S.M. KANTIKAR,MEMBER

For the Appellant :
For the Respondent :

Dated : 07 Mar 2019
ORDER

 

For Satish Kakri

:

Mr. Jamshed Ansari, Advocate

Mr. Varun  D. Ghadage, son of Appellant

 

For M/s. Continental  Carriers Ltd.

:

Mr. Shalabh Singhal, Advocate

 

 

For Iran Airlines

:

Mr. Javed Akhtar, Advocate  

 

Dated:   07.03.2019

 

 

JUDGMENT

 

JUSTICE V.K.JAIN,  (ORAL)

 

I.A. No. 7341 of 2017 in First Appeal No. 568 of 2014

          This application has been filed by the appellant, seeking permission to place some additional documents on record.  The documents sought to be filed by the appellant comprise (i) a forwarding letter dated 05.03.1998 addressed to Continental Carrier Ltd., (ii) the invoice dated 03.03.1998, (iii) GR form and (iv) packing list.  The said documents were not filed before the State Commission.  The documents are taken on record, subject to payment of Rs. 25,000/- as costs to the respondents.  The respondents are also permitted to file additional documents before the State Commission in order to rebut the additional documents allowed to be filed by the appellant. The application stands disposed of.

First Appeals No. 568/2014, 1453/2014 and 1094/2014

2       Since the additional documents filed by the complainant have been taken on record with liberty to the opposite parties in the complaint to file additional documents before the State Commission to rebut the additional documents filed by the complainant, it becomes imperative to remit the matter back to the State Commission to decide the same afresh after considering the additional documents filed by the complainant as well as the additional documents which the opposite parties may file in order to rebut those documents.  The impugned order is, therefore set aside and the matter is remitted back to the State Commission to decide the same afresh in the light of the additional documents filed by the complainant as well as the additional documents, if any, which may be filed by the opposite parties within four weeks from today in order to rebut the additional documents, allowed to be filed by the complainant.  Considering the age of the case, the State Commission is directed to decide the matter afresh in terms of this order within six months from the parties appearing before it.  The cost by M/s. Continental Carriers Ltd. in terms of the last order has been paid.  The cost by Iran Airlines has not been paid.  That cost shall be adjusted against the cost imposed today upon the complainant by Iran Airlines paying half of the said cost to M/s. Continental Carriers Ltd. 

3.      The parties to appear before the State Commission on 13.05.2019.

          The appeals stand disposed of.

 
......................J
V.K. JAIN
PRESIDING MEMBER
......................
DR. S.M. KANTIKAR
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.