View 30222 Cases Against Finance
View 30222 Cases Against Finance
INDIABULLS HOSING FINANCE LTD. filed a consumer case on 16 Jan 2017 against COMMANDER ASHOK KUMAR ANAND in the StateCommission Consumer Court. The case no is A/1067/2016 and the judgment uploaded on 16 Feb 2017.
STAE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA
First Appeal No.1067 of 2016
Date of Institution:07.11.2016
Date of Decision:16.01.2017
Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited, Indiabulls, House, Udyog vihar Phase-IV, Gurgaon.
…..Appellant
Versus
1. Commander Ashok Kumar Anand, S/o Sh.Dharamvir Anand, R/o L-3/30 DLF City Phase-II, Gurgaon (Haryana)..
2. Mrs Renu Anand W/o Commander Ashok Kumar L-3/30, DLF city PH-II, Gurgaon.
…..Respondents
CORAM: Mr.R.K.Bishnoi, Judicial Member
Mrs.Urvashi Agnihotri, Member
Present:- Mr.Hitender Kansal proxy counsel for Mr.P.M.Goyal,, Advocate counsel for the appellant.
ORDER
R.K.BISHNOI, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
It was alleged by complainant that he applied for housing loan with opposite party (O.P.). Loan agreement was executed on 15.03.2011 between them and loan was to be disbursed on 18.04.2011 and as such pre-EMI interest was to be charged from the date of disbursal of the loan i.e. on 18.04.2011 interest was to be charged from 18.04.2011 to 09.05.2011, whereas the scheme was commenced from 10.05.2011. O.P. charged illegal interest of Rs.72147/- from him. O.P. recovered first EMI on 10.05.2011, whereas the same was recoverable from 10.06.2011. He requested OP to accept part payment, but, O.P. did not accept the same. He challenged the charging of interest on monthly basis instead of on daily reducing basis.
2. O.P. was proceeded ex parte vide order dated 29.07.2016.
3. After hearing both the parties, learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Gurgaon (In short “District Forum”) allowed complaint vide impugned order dated 30.08.2016 and directed as under:-
“Thus, we direct the opposite party to refund an amount of Rs.48082/- (if not refunded) to the complainant which has been charged on account of wrong fixing of EMI date.
The opposite party is also directed to pay a sum of Rs.13261/- (if not refunded) on account of wrong denial of part pre-payment as the opposite party was under an obligation to charge interest on daily reducing basis. The opposite party is further directed to pay Rs.10,000/- as compensation for mental agony and harassment and litigation charges.”
4. Feeling aggrieved therefrom, O.P.-appellant has preferred this appeal.
5. Arguments heard. File perused.
6. Learned counsel for the appellants vehemently argued that the learned District forum wrongly proceeded ex parte and due opportunity of hearing be afforded.
7. It is opined by this Commission in Revision Petition No.39 of 2016 titled as M/s Pareena Infrastructure Vs. Ms. Nell Acharya decided on 01.07.2016 that matter can be remanded even without issuing notice to other party. It is the golden principle of law that proper opportunity of hearing should be afforded to the other party and one cannot be condemned unheard.
8. The complainant is not going to suffer any irreparable loss if appellant-O.Ps. are afforded an opportunity of defending themselves before the learned District Forum, so in these circumstances ex parte proceedings dated 29.07.2016 initiated against them are set aside and impugned order dated 30.08.2016 is hereby set aside subject to payment of costs of Rs.5000/- to the complainant before the District Forum. Appeal is allowed. Let the appellant be afforded an opportunity to file reply and lead evidence etc. thereafter the complaint be decided on merits.
9. The parties are directed to appear before the District Forum, Hisar on 20.02.2017.
January 16th, 2016 Urvashi Agnihotri R.K.Bishnoi, Member Judicial Member Addl. Bench Addl.Bench
S.K.
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.