Haryana

Karnal

263/2014

Balwinder Singh S/o Jarnail Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

City Communication., Service Zone, A Karbon Service Centre., Jaina Marketing And Associates - Opp.Party(s)

Satpal Singh

29 Sep 2014

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. 263/2014
 
1. Balwinder Singh S/o Jarnail Singh
V. Urlana Kurd Teh. Matlauda Distt. Panipat
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Subhash Goyal PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MS. Shashi Sharma MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL.

 

                                                          Complaint No. 263 of 2014                                                                                                         Date of instt.  19.09.2014

                                                          Date of decision: 27.03.2015

 

Balwinder Singh son of Jarnail Singh resident of village Urlana Kurd Tehsil Matlauda District Panipat.

                                                                 ………Complainant.

                                                Vs.

  1. M/s City Communication, Committee Chowk, Railway Road, Karnal though Its proprietor/ partner.
  2. M/s Service Zone, A Karbon Service Centre, SCO No. 22, Mugal Canal, Karnal through its owner/partner.
  3. Jaina Marketing and Associates, D-170-173, Okhla Industrial Area, Phase -1, New Delhi through its Managing Director/Authorized Signatory.

………Opposite Parties.

 

                   Complaint U/s 12 of the Consumer

                   Protection Act.

 

Before          Sh.Subhash Goyal ………. President.

                   Smt. Shashi Sharma  ….……. Member.

 

 Present       Sh.Satpal Singh Advocate for the complainant.

                   Sh.Gajender Chandel ASM alongwith Mohit Tayal Advocate for OP no.3.

                   OP No.2 and 3 ex parte.

ORDER:

                   Sh.Gajender Chandel ,ASM of the Ops has made a statement that the Ops are ready to replace the old mobile set (K 051) with a new one of the same model subject to return of old mobile set alongwith accessories.

                   Thereafter, the learned counsel for the complainant has made a statement for withdrawal of the complaint.        Statements of both the parties have been reduced into writing.      In view of the statements made by the parties, the present complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the parties shall be bound by their respective statements. The parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and the file be consigned to the record room after due compliance.  

Announced:

27.03.2015.                                                                                                                                                      

                                                                                      (Subhash Goyal)

                                                                                            President,

             (Smt. Shashi Sharma )                                          District Consumer Disputes

                    (Member)                                                      Redressal Forum, Karnal

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Subhash Goyal]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MS. Shashi Sharma]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.