Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

FA/130/2013

J. HARIPRAKASH - Complainant(s)

Versus

CIRCUIT WORLD TELECOM PRIVATE LIMITED, THE MANAGER - Opp.Party(s)

M. DHARMARAJAN

28 Feb 2022

ORDER

BEFORE THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                             PRESIDENT

                         Tmt. Dr. S. M. LATHA MAHESWARI                           MEMBER

 

F.A. No.130/2013

(Against the Order dt.19.12.2012 made in C.C. No.213/2012 on the file of

D.C.D.R.C., Coimbatore)

                         DATED THE 28^TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022

 

 

J. Hariprakash,

S/o. Mr. Jaganathan,

Door No.78, Pudur Main Road,

Peelambedu Pudur,

Coimbatore – 641 004.                                                            .. Appellant / Complainant.

-Versus-

 

1. The Manager,

M/s. Circuit World Telecom Private Limited,

Regional Office,

No,408, Bharathiyar Road,

New Siddhapudhur,

Coimbatore – 641 044.

 

2. The Manager,

M/s. Nokia V. Care Service Centre,

No.408, 1^st Floor, Bharathiyar Road,

New Siddhapudhur,

Coimbatore – 641 044.                                                    espondents / Opposite parties.

 

Counsel for the Appellant / Complainant               : M/s. M. Dharmarajan

Counsel for the Respondents / Opposite parties   : M/s. A. Dhamodaran

 

          This appeal coming up before us on 28.02.2022 for appearance of both, for filing written arguments of both and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal and this Commission made the following Order in open court:                                                                                                

 

 

Docket Order

 

No representation for both.  This appeal is posted today for appearance of both, for filing written arguments of both and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal. 

When the matter was called at 10.30 A.M., the Appellant was not present.  Hence, passed over and called again at 01.15 P.M. still, there is no representation for the appellant.  Hence we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case.

Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default.  No order as to costs.

 

               

                   Sd/-                                                                                        Sd/-                                                                        

S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                                                                            R.SUBBIAH                        

           MEMBER                                                                                           PRESIDENT