Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/247/2017

Sridevi & 3 ors - Complainant(s)

Versus

CholamandalamMS General Insurance Co. Ltd., Rep by its Managing Director & anr - Opp.Party(s)

S.Seralathan

31 Jul 2023

ORDER

IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE          Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                           PRESIDENT

                      Thiru. R. VENKATESAPERUMAL                            MEMBER

                     

C.C. No.247/2017

DATED THE 31^ST DAY OF JULY 2023

1. Sridevi,

W/o. Late Mr. Dhivakaran,

 

2. Pavithra,

D/o. Late Mr. Dhivakaran,

 

3. Sarathamma,

W/o. Mr. Sreedharankurup,

 

4. Minor Hirajith,

S/o. Late Mr. Dhivakaran,

Represented by his natural guardian and  mother,

Mrs. Sridevi,

 

All are residing at:

Plot No.26 B., 2^nd Cross Street,

Iyyappa Nagar,

Ayappakkam,

Chennai – 600 077.                                                                                  .. Complainants.                                                   

- Versus –

1. Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Co. Ltd.,

Represented by its Managing Director,

Mr. S.S. Gopalarathanam,

Harinivas Towers, 2^nd Floor,

No.163, Thambu Chetty Street,

parrys Corner,

Chennai – 600 001.  

 

2. Dewan Housing Finance Corp. Ltd.,

Represented by its Authorised Officer,

Kalpathika Tower,

Old No.24, New No.36, 2^nd Floor,

Dr. Ambedkar Road,

Ashok Nagar Main Road,

Kodambakkam,

Chennai – 600 024.                                                                        .. Opposite parties.

 

Counsel for the complainants              : M/s. S. Seralathan

Counsel for the 1^st opposite party        : M/s. M.B. Gopalan Associates

Counsel for the 2^nd opposite party       : M/s. V. Balasubramani

 

This consumer complaint coming up before us on 31.07.2023                                                             for appearance of the complainant and for appropriate orders or for dismissal and this Commission made the following Order in open court: 

                                                    

Docket Order

 

Opposite parties 1 & 2 present. No representation for the complainant.

Today, this matter is posted for appearance of the complainant and for appropriate orders or for dismissal.  

When the matter was called at 10.30 A.M., there was no representation for the complainant.  Hence, the matter was passed over and again called at 01.00 P.M., still, there was no representation for the complainant.  Hence, we are of the view that keeping the consumer complaint pending is of no use as the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case.

Hence, this consumer complaint is dismissed for default.   No costs.

 

 

               Sd/-                                                                                         Sd/-                                                                        

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                         R.SUBBIAH                        

             MEMBER                                                                                       PRESIDENT