Kerala

Kasaragod

CC/15/201

Harresh P - Complainant(s)

Versus

cholamandalam - Opp.Party(s)

Udaya kumara R

01 Sep 2015

ORDER

C.D.R.F. Kasaragod
Kerala
 
Complaint Case No. CC/15/201
 
1. Harresh P
s/o Aithappa suvarna R/at Kannur Road, Maippady post
kasaragod
Kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. cholamandalam
investment and finance company Limited
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. P.RAMADEVI PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Shiba.M.Samuel MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

D.O.F:30/07/15

D.o.O:22/4/2016

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KASARAGOD

                                         CC.NO.201/15

                             Dated this, the 22nd    day of  April  2016

PRESENT:

SMT.P.RAMADEVI            : PRESIDENT

SMT.SHIBA.M.SAMUEL    : MEMBER 

Hareesh.P.  S/o Aithappa Suvarna,

Rahman Manzil,Chowki,

 R/at Kannur Road,Maippady Po  Kasaragod.                                       :Complainant

 (Adv.UdayaKumar.R)

 

 Cholamandalam Investment& Finance Co.Ltd,  

Pranam Arcade,Hosdurg,  Kanhangad Branch.                                     : Opposite party

 (Adv.Babu chandran)

                                                           ORDER

SMT.P.RAMADEVI    : PRESIDENT

    Opposite parties raised an issue regarding  the maintainability of the complaint before this forum in the light of the order passed by the Hon’ble National Commission  in Magna Fincorp.Ltd & others vs Praveen  Benson  & others (RP.No.1936/15) dtd. 3/11/2015.

   That the contention of the opposite party  that the complaint is barred by principles of res judicata  since  the arbitration award is  passed in respect of the same  subject matter and the complainant is not maintainable before this Forum.

  Heard both sides.  In this case an arbitration  award  is passed in respect of the same subject matter. The observation of the Hon’ble National Commission is  “ in view of the decision of the Arbitrator which is binding on parties, the forum below should not have passed an order by over looking the award”.

    On going through the above decision of the Hon’ble National Commission and on perusal of  the documents , we are of the view that the complaint is barred by principles of resjudicata and hence it is not maintainable before this Forum.  Therefore the   complaint is dismissed  .  No order as to cost.

Sd/                                                                                                                                                            Sd/

MEMBER                                                                                                                             PRESIDENT

eva                                                            /forwarded by order/

 

                                                                   SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. P.RAMADEVI]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Shiba.M.Samuel]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.