Circuit Bench Asansol

StateCommission

IA/8/2021

Dinesh Kumar Malakar - Complainant(s)

Versus

Cholamandalam MSG I.C. Limited and other - Opp.Party(s)

Birendra Pathak

17 Nov 2021

ORDER

ASANSOL CIRCUIT BENCH
of
WEST BENGAL STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
KSTP COMMUNITY HALL , DAKSHIN DHADKA
ASANSOL, PASCHIM BURDWAN - 713302
 
Interlocutory Application No. IA/8/2021
( Date of Filing : 03 Mar 2021 )
In
First Appeal No. A/2/2021
(Arisen out of Order Dated 10/11/2020 in Case No. CC/141/2020 of District Burdwan)
 
1. Dinesh Kumar Malakar
S/O Sudheswar Kumar MalakarR/O Pure Sitalpur Colliery, P.O-Bahula, P.S- AndalDistrict- Paschim Bardhaman, pin-713322
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Cholamandalam MSG I.C. Limited and other
Chhabildas Tower, 3rd Floor, 6A Middleton Street, Kolkata-700071, West Bengal
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. KAMAL DE PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. ASHIS KUMAR BASU MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Birendra Pathak, Advocate for the Appellant 1
 
Dated : 17 Nov 2021
Final Order / Judgement

Hon'ble Mr. Kamal De, Presiding Member 

Order No. 07

Date : 17.12.2021

Parties are present through their respective Ld. Lawyers.

The instant IA/8/2021 is taken up for hearing.

Heard Ld. Lawyer of respective sides. Considered.

The instant IA Case is related to an application for condonation of delay.

In filing the IA, it is stated by the appellant/petitioner that the impugned order was passed by the Ld. Forum below on 10.11.2020. The appellant visited the Ld. Advocate, thereafter, obtained certified copy on 24.11.2020.

The conducting Advocate made some delay in handing over the entire case papers to the petitioner and, thereafter, the appellant engaged the present Advocate on 09.12.2020 and in the process there was some delay in filing the Appeal and there has been a delay of 56 days in preferring the instant Appeal.

The appellant has prayed for condonation of delay.

Both the respondents have filed separate written objections against the application for condonation of delay and have stated that the application for condonation of delay is not maintainable in law and the statement regarding delay is not satisfactory and as such the application for condonation of delay is liable to be dismissed.

Perused the case record, we find that the impugned order was passed by the Ld. Forum below on 10.11.2020 and the appellant applying for certified copy on 24.11.2020 and received the same on the self-same date i.e. 24.11.2020. Thereafter, they filed the instant Appeal on 03.03.2021.

There has been a delay of 67 days.

The ground for delay as we find is change of Lawyer.

Bearing in mind, the observations of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in S.S. Group Pvt. Ltd. VS Aaditiya J. Garg (SC) and SUO MOTO WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) Nos. 3/2020], and having regard to the materials on record, we feel inclined to allow the IA Case.

Hence,            

                                                            ORDERED

That the instant IA/8/2021 is allowed on contest.

No order as to cost

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. KAMAL DE]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. ASHIS KUMAR BASU]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.