Haryana

Karnal

CC/574/2024

Ram Nath - Complainant(s)

Versus

Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Bal Krishan Sharma

05 Dec 2024

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

                                                   Complaint No.574 of 2024

                                                          Date of instt. 22.11.2024

                                                          Date of Decision 05.12.2024

 

1.     Ram Nath aged about 61 years son of Shri Ram Parshad (father of deceased Kuldeep Singh;

2.     Santosh aged about 59 years wife of Ram Nath (mother of deceased Kuldeep Singh);

3.     Sonia Devi aged about 33 years (widow);

4.     Simran minor aged 15 years (daughter);

5.     Harsh minor aged about 13 years (son) of late Kuldeep Singh son of Ram Nath

        Minor complainants No.4 & 5 who are living under the care and custody of their mother Smt.Sonia Devi, who has got no adverse interest to that of minors, so the minors are filing the present complaint through their mother- complainant No.3 as their natural guardian and mother.

All residents of village Sikri, Tehsil and District Karnal.

                                                                                ……Complainants

                                                        Versus

Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company Limited, SCO No.2463-2464, 2nd Floor, Sector-22C, Chandigarh 160022, through its Branch Manager.

……Opposite party.

 

Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

Before      Sh. Jaswant Singh………President. 

Mrs.Neeru Agarwal………...Member

                Mrs. Sarvjeet Kaur…………Member.

                                       

Present:   Shri Mohit Sharma, counsel for the complainant.

                           

       Today the case is fixed for consideration on the point of admissibility.

        Learned counsel for the complainant has suffered his separate statement to effect that due to technical reason, he does not want to pursue with the present complaint and withdraws the same with permission to file the fresh complaint on the same cause of action before the competent Court of law.

      In view of the above statement, the present complaint is hereby dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant is at liberty to file fresh complaint on the same cause of action before the competent Court of law, if so desired. The original documents annexed with the complaint, if any, be returned to the complainant by placing on record photocopies of the same. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

 

Dated: 05.12.2024.           

                           President, 

District Consumer Disputes

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

  (Neeru Agarwal)              (Sarvjeet Kaur)

      Member                            Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.