Chandigarh

DF-II

CC/549/2012

Raghbir Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Sh. J.S.Baasi & Ravneet Mangat, Adv.

22 Oct 2012

ORDER


CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019
CONSUMER CASE NO. 549 of 2012
1. Raghbir SinghS/o Labh Singh, villagte Mandvi, Distt. Sangrur, Now R/o #522, Tribune Colony, Gobind Vihar, Kansal, S.A.S.Nagar (Mohali) ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company LimitedRegistered Head Office: Dare House, 2nd Floor, No.2, N.S.C. Bose Road, Chennai-600001, through its Director2. Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company LimitedRegional Office, SCO 2463-64, 2nd Floor, Sector 22C, Chandigarh, through its Manager ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :Sh. J.S.Baasi & Ravneet Mangat, Adv., Advocate for
For the Respondent :

Dated : 22 Oct 2012
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM–II, U.T. CHANDIGARH

 

Consumer Complaint No.549 of 2012

 

 

Raghbir Singh         Vs.     Cholamandalam MS General Insurance                                                 Company Limited & anr.

 

 

PRESENT:

 

Sh.J.S.Baasi, Counsel for Complainant.

 

 

Dated the 22nd day of October, 2012

 

ORDER

 

            Counsel for complainant has made the following statement, recorded separately:-

“Due to technical defect, I do not press this complaint at this stage. It be dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant reserves his right to file a fresh complaint on the same cause of action after removal of the technical defect.”

 

 

            In view of the above statement of counsel for complainant, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh complaint on the same cause of action after removal of the technical defect, as per law.

            Certified copy of this order be communicated to the complainant free of cost. After compliance file be consigned.

 

                        Sd/-                                                                 Sd/-

            (MADHU MUTNEJA)                                           (LAKSHMAN SHARMA)           

                        MEMBER                                                          PRESIDENT

 


MRS. MADHU MUTNEJA, MEMBERHONABLE MR. LAKSHMAN SHARMA, PRESIDENT ,