Haryana

Karnal

CC/153/2015

Smt. Raj Rani W/o Raj Kumar - Complainant(s)

Versus

Cholamandalam Investment And Finance Company Limited - Opp.Party(s)

L.S. Lote

09 Jun 2016

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL.

                                                               Complaint No.153 of 2015

                                                               Date of instt.: 15.07.2015

                                                                Date of decision 09.06.2016

Smt. Raj Rani wife of late Shri Raj Kumar son of Shri Phool Singh resident of house no.806/109, Rajiv Puram, Phoosgarh Road, Karnal.

…………..Complainant.

                             Versus

1. The Manager, Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Co. Ltd. Sector 12, Karnal.

2. Manager, TATA AIA Life Group Singla Premium Personal Reducting Term Insurance Protection Plan Policy through its authorized signatory Sector 12 Karnal.

3.Customer Care Unit, Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Co. Ltd. No. C 54-55, Thiru Vi Ka Industrial Estate, opposite to Mical, Gundy, Chennai-600032.

 

.                                                                               ………… Opposite Parties.

                     Complaint u/s 12  of the Consumer Protection Act.

Before:         Sh.K.C.Sharma……….President.

                   Sh.Anil Sharma…….Member.

Present:        Sh. L. S. Lote Advocate for complainant.

                   Shri Dheeraj Sachdeva Advocate for opposite parties no.1 and 3

                   with Sh. Jai Chand G.P.A. Sr. Process Incharge for Cholamandlam.

                    Shri Vikas Bakshi Advocate for opposite party no.2

 

                  

ORDER:

                   Shri Jai Chand G.P.A. for Cholamandlam made statement that opposite party no.2 had settled the claim of the complainant by making payment of Rs.50,683/- vide cheque no.154584 and the said amount was deposited in the loan account on 8.9.2015. He also filed copy of statement of account. Thereafter, learned counsel for the complainant made statement that he does not want to pursue the present complaint. Hence, complaint is dismissed. The statement of both the parties has been recorded separately.

2.                In view of the statement made by the learned counsel of complainant, the present complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, both the parties shall be bound by their respective statements. The parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and the file be consigned to the record room after due compliance.

Announced
dated:9.6.2016.

                                                               (K.C.Sharma)

                                                                   President,

                                                         District Consumer Disputes

                                                          Redressal Forum, Karnal.

                               (Anil Sharma ) 

                      Member.