Haryana

Ambala

CC/247/2023

TAJ MUHAMMAD. - Complainant(s)

Versus

CHOLAMANDALA, INVESTMENT & FINANACE COMPANY LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

YODGESH KUMAR PAL

14 Aug 2024

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, AMBALA.

                                                          Complaint case no.          :      247 of 2023.

                                                          Date of Institution          :      18.07.2024.

                                                          Date of decision     :      14.08.2024.

 

 

Taj Muhammad son of Shri Ranveer Ali aged 60 years resident of House No.168, Village Dera, Tehsil Naraingarh, District Ambala.

 

          ……. Complainant.

 

                                                Versus

     1.       Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited Having head office at Dare House, 2 N.S.C. Bose Road, Parry’s Corner George Town, Chennai,    Tamil  Nadu-600001 through its Managing Director. 

     2.       Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company having its Regional Centre, Near St. Francise School, Kala Amb to Naraingarh Road, Kala Amb, Haryana  through its Regional Manager.

 

                                                                                       ….…. Opposite Parties.       

Before:        Smt. Neena Sandhu, President.

                   Smt. Ruby Sharma, Member.

                   Shri  Vinod Kumar Sharma, Member.

                                               

Present:       None for the complainant.

                   OPs No.1 & 2 already ex parte.

 

          Complaint under Section 35 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019

 

Order by:-  Smt. Neena Sandhu, President.

 

          Today, the case was fixed for leading evidence by the complainant, subject to deposit of cost of Rs.1000/-, in the legal aid account of this Commission, but none has appeared on behalf of the complainant. From the perusal of zimni orders, it is revealed that even from the last two dates of hearing i.e. 08.07.2024 and 07.08.2024, none appeared on behalf of the complainant. Case called several times since morning, but none has appeared on behalf of complainant to deposit the cost and to lead evidence. It appears that the complainant is not interested to pursue the present complaint. Accordingly, the present complaint is dismissed in default for want of prosecution. Certified copy of the order be sent to the parties free of costs as per rules. File be indexed and consigned to record room.

Pronounced: 14.08.2024.

          Member                                   Member                                 President

                   DCDRC, Ambala