Kerala

StateCommission

RA/10/2023

THE MANAGER DISTRICT CO OPERATIVE BANK - Complainant(s)

Versus

CHITRALEKHA - Opp.Party(s)

05 Jun 2023

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
 
Review Application No. RA/10/2023
( Date of Filing : 24 May 2023 )
In
First Appeal No. A/16/854
 
1. THE MANAGER DISTRICT CO OPERATIVE BANK
.....
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. CHITRALEKHA
....
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SRI.K.SURENDRA MOHAN PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. SRI.AJITH KUMAR.D JUDICIAL MEMBER
  SRI.RADHAKRISHNAN.K.R MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 05 Jun 2023
Final Order / Judgement

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

REVIEW APPLICATION No. 10/2023 in APPEAL No. 854/2016

ORDER DATED: 05.06.2023

PRESENT:

HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI. K. SURENDRA MOHAN     : PRESIDENT

SRI. AJITH KUMAR D.                                                    : JUDICIAL MEMBER

SMT. BEENA KUMARY. A                                              : MEMBER

SRI. RADHAKRISHNAN K.R.                                        : MEMBER

REVIEW PETITIONERS:

 

  1. The Branch Manager, Thiruvananthapuram District Co-operative Bank, Sreekaryam Branch, Sreekaryam P.O., Pangappara Village, Thiruvananthapuram. (Presently Kerala State Co-operative Bank Sreekariyam Branch).

 

  1. Thiruvananthapuram District Co-operative Bank, represented by its Managing Director, East Fort, Thiruvananthapuram (Presently General Manager, Kerala State Co-operative Bank Ltd., East Fort, Thiruvananthapuram).   

 

(By Adv. Kulathoor S.V. Premakumaran Nair)

 

                                                Vs.

RESPONDENT:

 

Chitralekha K.J., Sree Chitra, Keraladithyapuram, SP 12/471/1, Uliyazhathura Village, Thiruvananthapuram.

 

 

ORDER

HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI. K. SURENDRA MOHAN : PRESIDENT

 

The review petitioners before us are the appellants in Appeal No. 854/2016.  The appeal was dismissed as per judgment dated 30.11.2022.  The appeal had been adjourned on a number of occasions since there was no representation for the appellants.  Therefore, the appeal was posted finally for hearing to 30.11.2022.  On the said date also there was no representation for the appellants.  Therefore, the appeal was dismissed.  The said order is sought to be reviewed in this petition. 

2.  According to the counsel for the appellants, there was no wilful negligence or omission on the part of the review petitioners in following up the progress of the case.  Since the review petitioners have a strong case on the merits, a review of the order is sought. 

3.  Heard the counsel for the review petitioners.  As per Sec. 50 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, the power of review available to this Commission is confined to orders in which there is an error apparent on the face of the record.  In the present case, no error apparent on the face of the record exists, nor has any such error been pointed out by the review petitioner.

In view of the above, this review petition is dismissed.

 

JUSTICE K. SURENDRA MOHAN  : PRESIDENT

 

                             AJITH KUMAR  D. : JUDICIAL MEMBER

 

                                                                                             BEENA KUMARY. A         : MEMBER

 

jb                                                                                           RADHAKRISHNAN K.R.  : MEMBER

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SRI.K.SURENDRA MOHAN]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. SRI.AJITH KUMAR.D]
JUDICIAL MEMBER
 
 
[ SRI.RADHAKRISHNAN.K.R]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.