Maharashtra

Pune

CC/16/30

Mr.Jairoop Ghamandram Choudhary - Complainant(s)

Versus

Chief Manager Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd Through Director - Opp.Party(s)

Adv.J.S. Kulkarni

02 Mar 2017

ORDER

PUNE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM
PUNE
Shri V. P. Utpat, PRESIDENT
Shri Onkar G. Patil, MEMBER
Smt. K. B. Kulkarni, MEMBER
 
Complaint Case No. CC/16/30
 
1. Mr.Jairoop Ghamandram Choudhary
Flat No A16 3rd floor Karan Gharonda Sainikwadi No 22 Wadgaon Sheri Pune 14
Pune
Maharashtra
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Chief Manager Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd Through Director
Add.F 1603 16th floor Ambadeep Building 14 Kasturba Gandhi Marg Connought Place New Delhi 110 001.
Pune
Maharashtra
2. Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited Through Manager
Add.413 .424 Sorabh Hall 4th floor 21 Sasoon Rd Pune 411 001.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. V. P. UTPAT PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Onkar G. Patil MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 02 Mar 2017
Final Order / Judgement

ORDER

Per – Hon’ble Mr. V. P. Utpat, President

          None present for the Complainant even on second call.  Today Complainant failed to appear before this Forum without any sufficient reason.  Perusal of the order-sheet reveals that this consumer complaint was admitted on 27/01/2016 and notice was directed to be issued calling upon the Opposite Party to file written version.  Order dated 27/01/2016 was passed in presence of the Complainant. Thus, Complainant was well-aware about the order dated 27/01/2016.  However, thereafter on all subsequent adjourned dates Complainant chose to consistently remain absent before this Forum and did not comply with earlier order passed by this Forum by taking appropriate steps for service of notice to the Opposite Party.  Thus, it appears that the Complainant has lost his interest in further prosecution of present consumer complaint.  In such circumstances, it is not desirable to prolong the complaint proceeding.  Hence, in accordance with provisions of Section-13(2)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 read with Rule-4(7) of the Maharashtra Consumer Protection Rules, 2000, present consumer complaint stands dismissed for want of prosecution.  No order as to costs.

Pronounced on Thursday, March 02, 2017

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. V. P. UTPAT]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. Onkar G. Patil]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.