Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/100/2012

K. RAM PRABHU - Complainant(s)

Versus

CHIEF REGIONAL MANAGER, UNITED BANK OF INDIA - Opp.Party(s)

MUTHUMANI

22 Nov 2022

ORDER

IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE          Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                           PRESIDENT

                      Thiru. R. VENKATESAPERUMAL                            MEMBER

                     

C.C. No.100/2012

DATED THE 22^ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022

K. Ram Prabhu,

S/o. Mr. A. Kandha Mani,

No.2, K.P.N. Colony 4^th Street,

Tiruppur – 641 601,

Tamil Nadu.                                                                                          .. Complainant.                                                   

- Versus –

 

1. The Chief Regional Manager,

United Bank of India,

No.217, R.K. Mutt Road,

Chennai – 600 004.

 

2. Mr. Krishna Mohan,

Senior Manager,

United Tower,

Head Office,

United Bank of India,

No.11, Hemanta Basu Sarani,

Kolkata – 700 001.

 

3. Mr. Jai Sankar,

Branch Manager,

United Bank of India,

Subramaniyar Swamy Koil Street,

T S Puram,

Vallipalayam,

Tiruppur – 641 601.                                                                            .. Opposite parties.

 

 

Counsel for the complainant         : M/s. Muthumani Duraisamy

Counsel for the opposite parties   : M/s. Kamala Kannan

This consumer complaint coming up before us on 22.11.2022 for appearance of both parties and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal and this Commission made the following Order in open court:                                                      

 

Docket Order

 

No representation for both parties. There was no representation for both parties continuously for the past several hearings. 

Today, this matter is posted for appearance of both parties and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal.  

When the matter was called at 10.30 A.M., there was no representation for the complainant.  Hence, the matter was passed over and again called at 01.00 P.M. still, there was no representation for the complainant.  Hence, we are of the view that keeping the consumer complaint pending is of no use as the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case.

Hence, the consumer complaint is dismissed for default.   No costs.

 

 

 

               Sd/-                                                                                                         Sd/-                                                                        

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                           R.SUBBIAH                        

             MEMBER                                                                                         PRESIDENT