Sri S.K.Sahoo,President.
This is a complaint filed U/s. 12 of C.Act, 1986, in which the complainant has prayed for acceptance of surrender of his policy and payment of surrender value to the complainant along with other reliefs.
2. The case of the complaint is that he has taken an insurance policy from the opp.parties on 07.03.2005 under Annuity Scheme named as “ Jeevan Akshay-III Plan “ on payment of Rs. 2,50,000.00 .The number of the said policy is 586127098 .After three years of the policy the complainant suffered from severe knee problem. The doctor advised him for treatment at Kaling Hospital or any other hospital where best treatment is given. The treatment advised by the doctor is an expensive one and he could not arrange the funds for his treatment. So on 23.05.2008 he approached the opp.parties to surrender the policy and payment of surrender value for his treatment. The opp.parties neither replied to his letter non accepted the surrender of the policy. Due to such conduct of the opp. parties the complainant sustained financial loss and mental agony. The opp. parties are liable for waste of his time and money. Hence this case.
3. On 14.07.2011 the opp. party No.1 has filed written statement . The case of the opp. party No.1 is that , admittedly the complaint is a policy holder bearing No. 586127098 which commenced from 07.03.2005 and the purchase price is Rs. 2,500,00.00 .As per Clause- 7 of the policy conditions, there is no scope for surrender of the policy. So the question of financial loss and mental agony of the complainant due to non-payment of surrender value does not arise. The complaint petition filed by the complainant be dismissed.
4. Perused the case record. On 07.10.2009 an exparte order was passed against all the opp. parties by the then Learned President, District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Angul . Against such order the opp.parties have approached the appellant authority i.e the Hon’ble State Commission, Odisha who has passed order on 30.12.2009 in First Appeal No. 1026 of 2009. In the said order of the Hon’ble State Commission directed to allow the opp.parties to file written statement and pass order after giving opportunity to the parties. Accordingly the opp.parties filed written statement on 14.07.2011 and the learned the then District Commission heard the parties.
Carefully gone through the complaint petition filed by the complainant, written version filed by the opp. party No.1 and the documents available on the case record. The photo copy of the policy obtained by the complainant is available in the case record. The said photo copies has been filed by the complainant. The policy relates to policy bond No. 586127098 Dtd.07.03.2005. On perusal of Column No.7 of the conditions and privileges of the policy it transpires that the policy shall not acquired any surrender value. So the prayer of the complainant to get the surrender value of the policy obtained by him is not at all acceptable. As the policy has no provision for surrender of the policy, the complainant is not entitled to any surrender value. So the question of loss of time , mental agony or monetary loss of the complainant if any is of no consideration. There is no deficiency in service on the part of the opp.parties.
5. Hence ordered :-
: O R D E R :
Case be and same is dismissed on contest against all the opp.parties. Parties are to bear their own cost.