Heard husband of the petitioner/complainant.  He submits before us that a sum of Rs.2 lakhs was deposited by the petitioner/complainant with a specific understanding that the same was to be deposited for a short period of 15 days after which the amount was to be returned to the petitioner/complainant.  He further states that the Bank never intimated the complainant about the adjustment of the said amount of Rs.2 lakhs against the loan taken by the husband of the complainant and as such cause of action is  continuing and the claim is not barred by limitation as held by two fora below. 

            To start with, we are of the view that the complainant is not even a consumer within the meaning of Section 2 (1) (d) of the Consumer Protection Act., 1986.  Besides this, the complainant had deposited the said amount for a period of 15 days only and after 15 days, the complainant could have asked the Bank to return the same.  It may be mentioned here that deposit was in fact made for a period of 45 days.  Therefore, if the compromise had not been worked out, the complainant was entitled to receive the amount after 15 days or at the most after 45 days. The complainant approached the District Forum after a gap of about 10 years. Thus,  the complaint was hopelessly barred by limitation.  Petitioner/Complainant further states that Civil Suit filed by the Bank has been decided.  In view of the above, we are not inclined to entertain this revision filed against  concurrent findings of two fora below. The revision is, hereby dismissed, with no order as to cost.