District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Faridabad.
Consumer Complaint No. 193/2021.
Date of Institution: 01.04.2021.
Date of Order: 09.08.2023
Sohan Lal Narula S/o Shri Chander Bhan, Age 73 years, R/o House No.311, Sector-22, Faridabad (Haryana).
…….Complainant……..
Versus
Chief Manager, Canara Bank, Main Branch, Nehru Ground, Faridabad.
…Opposite party……
Complaint under section-12 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986
Now amended Section 34 of Consumer protection Act 2019.
BEFORE: Amit Arora……………..President
Mukesh Sharma……..…Member
Indira Bhadana…………Member
PRESENT: Sh.R.C.Khanna, counsel for the complainant.
Shri Naresh Kumar, counsel for opposite party.
ORDER:
Today the case was fixed for arguments.
Instead of arguing the case, Shri Harry Khanna, counsel for the complainant has made a statement that “ I do not want to pursue the present complaint and wants to withdraw the same due to some technical fault and permission may kindly be granted to file fresh complaint before this competent court/Commission.
In view of the statement of the counsel for the complainant, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant is at liberty to file fresh complaint/suit or any other proceedings before any competent Commission/Authority/Court. The complainant can claim benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act to exclude the period spent in prosecuting proceedings under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 before this Commission while computing the period of limitation. File be consigned to the record room.
Announced on: 09.08.2023 (Amit Arora)
President
District Consumer Disputes
Redressal Commission, Faridabad.
(Mukesh Sharma)
Member
District Consumer Disputes
Redressal Commission, Faridabad.
(Indira Bhadana)
Member
District Consumer Disputes
Redressal Commission, Faridabad.
