Kerala

Thiruvananthapuram

295/2002

Coinpar - Complainant(s)

Versus

Chief GM - Opp.Party(s)

23 Oct 2009

ORDER


Thiruvananthapuram
Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum,Vazhuthacaud
consumer case(CC) No. 295/2002

Coinpar
K.Sharma		 ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.

Chief GM
Chief AO
District GM		 ...........Respondent(s)


BEFORE:
1. Smt. Beena Kumari. A 2. Smt. S.K.Sreela 3. Sri G. Sivaprasad

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):




ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

 

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM

VAZHUTHACAUD : THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

PRESENT:

SHRI. G. SIVAPRASAD : PRESIDENT

SMT. BEENA KUMARI. A : MEMBER

SMT. S.K. SREELA : MEMBER


 

O.P.No. 295/2002


 

Dated: 23..10..2009

Complainants:

          1. Centre of Indian Consumer Protection and Research (COINPAR), Mudavan Mugal, Trivandrum. Represented by its Secretary General M.A. Vahab.

             

          2. K. Sarma, T.C.28/2666(2), Soorya, Thodiyil Lane, Chettikulangara, Trivandrum – 1.

 

Opposite Parties:

          1. Chief General Manager, M/s. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, P.M.G., Trivandrum.

             

          2. District Geneal Manager, M/s. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, Kowdiar, Trivandrum.

             

          3. Chief Accounts Officer, M/s. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, Trivandrum Telecom District, East Fort, Trivandrum – 23.


 

ORDER


 

Since the dispute is in connection with the Telegraph Act, the remedy under Consumer Protection Act is barred in the light of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court vide order dated 1/9/2009 in Civil Appeal No.7687 of 2004 between General Manager, Telecom & M. Krishnan and Others. In view of the above, the complaint is dismissed as not maintainable. Complainant is at liberty to seek redress from appropriate authority.


 

G. SIVAPRASAD,

PRESIDENT.

 

BEENA KUMARI. A : MEMBER


 


 

S.K. SREELA : MEMBER


 


 




......................Smt. Beena Kumari. A
......................Smt. S.K.Sreela
......................Sri G. Sivaprasad