BEFORE THE TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION : HYDERABAD.
FA.NO.85 OF 2021
AGAINST THE ORDERS IN CC.NO.261/2019,
DISTRICT CONSUMER COMMISSION, RANGA REDDY
Between:
Jitendra Jain, S/o.Late Sh MC Jain,
aged about 54 years,
Resident of: E7/1, Research Centre Imarat,
RCI Road, P.O.Vignyana Kancha, and
Ranga Reddy District 500069
Residence wef 18 Jan 2021
Is Flat No.H28, 1302, Flat No.H28,
1302, AWHO Sandeep Vihar,
Hoskote Rd, Kannamangala,
Whitefield Bengaluru, Karnataka 560115
Mobile Number 9461700352
.……Appellant/Complainant
And
1. Chief General Manager, Bharat Sanchar
Nigam Limited, Bharat Sanchar Bhawan,
Harish Chandra Mathur Lane,
Janpath New Delhi 110001
Email Hcpant@CC/261/2019.Co.In , Represented
by its Manager.
2. Dr.Lal Pathlabs Ltd., Dr.Lal Pathlabs Limited,
Regd.Office: Block E, Sector-18, Rohini,
New Delhi – 110085,
Fax:+91 124 4234468,
Customer.Care@lalpathlabs.com
cs@lalpathlabs.com
………..Represented by its Managr.
3. Chairman, Telecom Regulatory Authority of
India, Mahanagar Doorsanchar Bhawan
(next to Zakir Hussain College) Jawaharlal
Nehru Marg (Old Minto Road)
New Delhi: 110 002
Email ID: ap@trai.gov.in
……..Represented by its Manager.
…..Respondents/Opposite Parties
Counsel for the Appellant/Complainant : Sri Jitendra Jain (PIP)
Counsel for the Respondents/Opp.Parties : Sri Prabhakar
Reddy-R1
M/s.Altaf Fathima
(Caveator for R2)
Sri Sudhakar Rao
Kulkarni – R3
QUORUM: SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL, HON’BLE PRESIDENT
FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND TWENTY ONE
*******
Order :
1. This is an appeal filed by the Appellant/Complainant under Section 41 of the Consumer Protection Act 2019, praying this Commission to allow the appeal by setting aside the order in CC.No.261/2019 dated 31.12.2020 passed by the District Commission, Ranga Reddy.
2. In this batch of appeals, the Appellant Sri Jitendra Jain is said to have died on 23.04.2021. Thereafter, this Commission has suo motu issued notices to the other Appellants/legal representatives of the deceased Jain, who are parties in the connected appeals and the same has been served as per the track record obtained from the postal authorities. In spite of that, there is no appearance for the LRs/other Appellants in the connected appeals. The learned counsel appearing for the Respondents are all present. Since the deceased Appellant died more than seven months back, the appeals are liable to be dismissed has having been abated.
3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.