Vina Kumari filed a consumer case on 29 Sep 2016 against Chief Administrator in the StateCommission Consumer Court. The case no is MA/38/2016 and the judgment uploaded on 31 Jan 2017.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA
Miscellaneous Application No.38 of 2016
In
First Appeal No : 1104 of 2015
Date of Institution: 25.04.2016
Date of Decision : 29.09.2016
Vina Kumari wife of Shri Krishan Kumar, resident of House No.1123, Sector 3, Part II, Rewari, Tehsil and District Rewari (Haryana).
Applicant/Appellant
Versus
1. Chief Administrator, Haryana Urban Development Authority, Panchkula.
2. Administrator, Haryana Urban Development Authority, Gurgaon.
3. Estate Officer, Haryana Urban Development Authority, Rewari.
Respondents-opposite parties
CORAM: Shri B.M. Bedi, Judicial Member.
Mrs. Urvashi Agnihotri, Member
Present: Shri Naresh Kumar, Advocate for applicant/appellant.
O R D E R
B.M. BEDI, JUDICIAL MEMBER
Vina Kumari-appellant (applicant herein) has filed the instant application to review the order dated 29th March, 2016 passed by this Commission.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant has stated that on 29th March, 2016, he argued the appeal on merits, but inadvertently the appeal was ordered to be dismissed as withdrawn.
3. Since the appeal has already been decided vide order dated 29th March, 2006, this Commission is not empowered to review its own decision in view of the judgment rendered by Hon’ble Supreme Court in Rajeev Hitendra Pathak and Others Vs. Achyut Kashinath Karekar and Another, IV (2011), CPJ 35, (S.C).
4. Hence, the application is dismissed.
Announced 29.09.2016 | (Urvashi Agnihotri) Member | (B.M. Bedi) Judicial Member |
|
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.