Karnataka

Mandya

CC/09/99

Sri.M.Hemanna - Complainant(s)

Versus

CHESCOM - Opp.Party(s)

Sri.P.Narendra Kumar

21 Dec 2009

ORDER


DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MANDYA
D.C.Office Compound, Opp. District Court Premises, Mandya - 571 401.
consumer case(CC) No. CC/09/99

Sri.M.Hemanna		 ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.

CHESCOM
CHESCOM,		 ...........Respondent(s)


BEFORE:
1. Smt.A.P.Mahadevamma2. Sri.M.N.Manohara3. Sri.Siddegowda

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):
1. Sri.P.Narendra Kumar

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):
1. Sri M.R.A.Prakash



Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

The Complainant is present.Joint mmemo is filed by both parties.In view of the Joint memo Complaint is allowed,directing the OPs to provide Electrical Power Supply to Complainant Pumpset with in a month.




......................Smt.A.P.Mahadevamma
......................Sri.M.N.Manohara
......................Sri.Siddegowda