Chandran,Proprietor, Royal Marble Works V/S T.S.Poulose,Thekkeveedu,Edavattom and Other - Consumer Court Case

Kerala

Kollam

CC/05/286

T.S.Poulose,Thekkeveedu,Edavattom and Other - Complainant(s)

Versus

Chandran,Proprietor, Royal Marble Works - Opp.Party(s)

Binu George

09 Jan 2008

ORDER

KOLLAM
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
consumer case(CC) No. CC/05/286

T.S.Poulose,Thekkeveedu,Edavattom and Other T.S.Gee Varghese, Anna Bhavan,Edavattom,Vellimon.P.O.						...........Appellant(s)
Vs.
Chandran,Proprietor, Royal Marble Works						...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:

1. K.VIJAYAKUMARAN ACHARI 2. RAVI SUSHA

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

By ADV. RAVI SUSHA, MEMBER This is a complaint filed by the complainant to get the floor of the house, newly layed marble with proper case and for other reliefs.. The averments in the complaint can be briefly summarized as follows: 1st complainant entered into a contract between the opposite party for laying marbles with Hydraulic machine for Rs.22/- per sq. feet in his brothers newly constructed house. But the opp.party did not lay marbles as per the agreement. Hence the complainants filed this complaint for getting relief. Opp.party dared not to turn up. He remained absent and therefore he was set exparte. The 1stcomplainant examined as PW.1 and marked Ext.P1 and P2 From the evidence of PW.1 and Ext.P1 and P2 we find that there is deficiency in service on the part of the opp.party and as such the complainant is entitled to get relief for deficiency in service committed by the opp.party. In the result the complaint is allowed directing the opp.party to pay Rs.50050/- with 9% interests. The opp.party is also directed to pay Rs.50,000/- as compensation. The order is to be complied within one month from the date of receipt of the order. Dated this the 09th day of January, 2008. K. Vijayakumaran Achary : Adv. Ravi Susha :

By ADV. RAVI SUSHA, MEMBER This is a complaint filed by the complainant to get the floor of the house, newly layed marble with proper case and for other reliefs.. The averments in the complaint can be briefly summarized as follows: 1st complainant entered into a contract between the opposite party for laying marbles with Hydraulic machine for Rs.22/- per sq. feet in his brothers newly constructed house. But the opp.party did not lay marbles as per the agreement. Hence the complainants filed this complaint for getting relief. Opp.party dared not to turn up. He remained absent and therefore he was set exparte. The 1stcomplainant examined as PW.1 and marked Ext.P1 and P2 From the evidence of PW.1 and Ext.P1 and P2 we find that there is deficiency in service on the part of the opp.party and as such the complainant is entitled to get relief for deficiency in service committed by the opp.party. In the result the complaint is allowed directing the opp.party to pay Rs.50050/- with 9% interests. The opp.party is also directed to pay Rs.50,000/- as compensation. The order is to be complied within one month from the date of receipt of the order. Dated this the 09th day of January, 2008. K. Vijayakumaran Achary : Adv. Ravi Susha :

......................K.VIJAYAKUMARAN ACHARI
......................RAVI SUSHA