Kerala

StateCommission

RP/09/71

Secretary, KSEB - Complainant(s)

Versus

Chandran - Opp.Party(s)

S.Balachandran

30 Apr 2010

ORDER

Revision Petition No. RP/09/71
(Arisen out of Order Dated 23/07/2009 in Case No. CC 94/09 of District Thiruvananthapuram)
1. Secretary, KSEBVaidyuthi Bhavan, Pattom, ThiruvananthapuramKerala2. Exe. EngineerElectrical Section, FortThiruvananthapuramKerala3. Asst. EngineerElectrical Section, FortThiruvananthapuramKerala ...........Appellant(s)

Versus
1. ChandranS/o Ponnu Reddy, T.C.38/423, Arathi Bhavan, Thycadu, ChenthittaThiruvananthapuramKerala ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE :
HONORABLE JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU PRESIDENT
PRESENT :

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

VAZHUTHACAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

 

REVISION PETITION .71/2009

ORDER DATED: 30.4.2010

 

PRESENT

JUSTICE SRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU  : PRESIDENT

SRI.M.K.ABDULLA SONA              : MEMBER

 

 

1. KSEB, represented by the               : REVISION PETITIONERS

    Secretary,

    Vaidyuthi Bhavan,

    Pattom,

    Thiruvananthapuram.

 

2. Executive Engineer,

    Electrical Section,

     Fort, Trivandrum.

 

3. Asst. Engineer,

    Electrical Section,

    Fort, Trivandrum.

 

(By Adv.S.Balachandran)

                Vs.

 

Chndran, S/o Ponnu Reddy,               : RESPONDENT

T.C.38/423, Arathi Bhavan,

Thuycaud, Chenthitta,

Trivandrum.

ORDER

 

JUSTICE SRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU  : PRESIDENT

                                                                

 

          The revision petitioners are the opposite parties/KSEB in IA.189/09 in CC 94/09 in the file of CDRF, Thiruvananthapuram.

2. The Forum as per the impugned order has directed the opposite parties to reconnect supply to the complainant within 5 days.  The dispute in the complaint filed was with respect to the additional bill issued for
Rs. 14,256/-.  As per the order of Forum the complainant has remitted the above amount.

3. It is the contention of the revision petitioners that on 16.5.09 theft of electricity was detected in the premises of the complainant and the criminal case has also been filed and an additional bill for Rs.44000/- has been issued.  According to the revision petitioner the above fact was suppressed in the complaint filed.

4. The counsel for the respondent/complainant has suggested that he shall remit the above amount of Rs.44000/- also and that the revision petitioner may be directed to reconnect the supply immediately.   It is submitted that the particular bill has not been  received by the complainant.

5. In the circumstances the respondent/complainant is directed to remit Rs.44,000/- as per the alleged bill issued.  The revision petitioner shall receive the amount  and  issue the complainant a copy of the  bill.  On receipt of the amount the revision petitioners shall immediately reconnect the supply.  Revision petition is disposed of  accordingly.   The genuineness of bill for Rs.44,000/- can also been agitated by the complainant before the Forum in the same proceedings.

Office is directed to forward the copy of this order to the  Forum urgently.

 

 

JUSTICE SRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU  : PRESIDENT

 

 

SRI.M.K.ABDULLA SONA              : MEMBER

 

 

ps

 

PRONOUNCED :
Dated : 30 April 2010

[HONORABLE JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU]PRESIDENT