West Bengal

StateCommission

FA/432/2014

Sahara India Pariwar - Complainant(s)

Versus

Chandra Rani Ray - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. Sukhendra Nath Chatterjee

26 Mar 2019

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
WEST BENGAL
11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087
 
First Appeal No. FA/432/2014
( Date of Filing : 10 Apr 2014 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 10/03/2014 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/132/2013 of District Burdwan)
 
1. Sahara India Pariwar
Command Office Sahara India Bhawan, 1, Kappoorthala Complex, Aliganj, Lucknow(U.P.), through its Managing Director.
2. Sahara India Pariwar
Br. Office Chak Dighimore, Anita Complex, 1st Floor, near Kristi Hall, P.S. Memari, Burdwan(W.B), through its Branch Manager.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Chandra Rani Ray
W/o Late Bhaskar Ray, R/o Vill. Palshit, Swasti Palli, P.O. Bhaita, P.S. Memari, Dist. Burdwan(W.B.)
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. SHYAMAL GUPTA PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. UTPAL KUMAR BHATTACHARYA MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:Mr. Sukhendra Nath Chatterjee, Advocate
For the Respondent: Ms. Aparna Shaw, Advocate
Dated : 26 Mar 2019
Final Order / Judgement

Sri Shyamal Gupta, Member

Through this Appeal, the Petitioner, M/s Sahara India Pariwar called in question the legality of the Order dated 10-03-2014, passed in CC/132/2013 by the Ld. District Forum, Burdwan.

The Appellants’ case, in short, is that following the death of Respondent’s husband, a beneficiary under the Sahara Rajat Yojana, the Respondent claimed insurance benefit under the aforesaid scheme.  As the Respondent did not submit requisite papers within the stipulated time frame, the instant claim was repudiated by the Insurance Company.  However, without arraying the Insurance Company to the case, the Respondent initiated the instant complaint case before the Ld. District Forum and the latter in a mechanical fashion, allowed the same; hence, this Appeal.

Heard the parties and perused the documents on record.

Undisputedly, the instant claim was supposed to be settled by the Oriental Insurance Company. However, without adding it as a party to the case, the Respondent initiated the complaint case.  It is indeed surprising that though this technical shortcoming was duly pointed out by the Appellant, necessary course correction was not done.  In terms of the Accidental Insurance Policy issued by the Oriental Insurance Company, the Appellant had no liability whatsoever to indemnify the Respondent.  Thus, we find that the instant claim was bad for non-joinder of necessary party.  In such circumstances, the Ld. District Forum ought not proceed with the case till due correction was made by the Respondent or dismiss the same on this score only.  The impugned order has no legal standing and accordingly, the same is not sustainable.

Thus, we find enough merit in this Appeal.

Hence,

O R D E R E D

The Appeal stands allowed on contest against the Respondent in part.  The impugned order is hereby set aside. Consequent thereof, the instant complaint case also stands dismissed. In the interest of natural justice, the Respondent is given due liberty to file a fresh case before the Ld. District Forum after arraying the Insurance Company into the case within 40 days from today.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. SHYAMAL GUPTA]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MR. UTPAL KUMAR BHATTACHARYA]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.