NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/3920/2011

URMILA - Complainant(s)

Versus

CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD & ORS. - Opp.Party(s)

MR. N.P. SHARMA

10 May 2012

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

NEW DELHI

REVISION PETITION NO. 3920 OF 2011

(Against the Order dated 26/08/2011 in Appeal No. 288/2010 of the State Commission Chandigarh)

1. URMILA W/o Shri SK Rohilla, R/o No-69 sector-10 Panchkula Haryana	...........Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD & ORS. through its Chairman,8, Jan Marg, Sector 9 Chandigarh Chandigarh 2. The Minicipal Corporation, UT Chandigarh, through its Municipal Commissioner, Sector-17 Chandigarh Chandigarh 3. Mrs Raksha Devi , W/o late Shri Shanti Swaroop Sharma, R/o House no-25, Sector-19-A Chandigarh Chandigarh 4. Superitendent Engineer (Operation) Dakshin Haryana Bijili Vitran Nigam Ltd, Division, Sector-23 Faridabad haryana	...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
	HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. B. GUPTA, PRESIDING MEMBER
	HON'BLE MR. VINAY KUMAR, MEMBER

For the Petitioner :

For Petitioner in R.P. No.3654/2011 and Respondent no.1 in R.P. No.3920 of 2011 Ms. Nidhi Tewari, Advocate for Mrs. Rachna Joshi Issar, Advocate

For the Respondent :

For Respondent no.1 in R.P. No.3654/2011 and Petitioner in R.P. No.3920 of 2011 : Ms. Girija Wadhwa, Advocate with Mr. Neeraj Pal Sharma, Advocate

Dated : 10 May 2012

ORDER

Learned counsel for petitioner Ms. Girija Wadhwa, in (RP 3920 of 2011) has placed on record letter signed by the petitioner for unconditional withdrawal of (RP 3920 of 2011).           In this letter petitioner has stated that she hereby give up all reliefs and rights for all times to come that may have accrued on account of passing of the final order dated 19.7.2010 passed by the DCDRF-I/Chandigarh, as against the opposite parties/respondents herein, as also all reliefs as accorded by the SCDRC Chandigarh, vide its final order dated 26.8.2011. Inconsequence, she withdraws consumer complaint (No.CC/1440/2009, decided on 19.7.2010). Accordingly, (RP No.3920 of 2011) pending before this Commission, may be permitted to be dismissed as withdrawn through her counsel.           In view of above averments made by petitioner (RP No.3920 of 2011), stands dismissed as withdrawn.            Consequently (Revision Petition No.3654 of 2011) filed by Chandigarh Housing Board Vs. Smt. Urmila and other, stand disposed of being infructuous.           Parties shall bear their own costs.

......................J

V. B. GUPTA

PRESIDING MEMBER

......................

VINAY KUMAR

MEMBER