DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II, U.T.CHANDIGARH

============

Satbir Singh s/o Sh. Hari Chand, R/o H.No.44-B, New Police Line, Sector 26, U.T. Chandigarh.

                      ^{...Complainant}

^Vs

Chandigarh Housing Board, through its Accounts Officer-III, #Jan Marg, Sector 9, Chandigarh.

^{... Opposite Party}

BEFORE:                 

Argued By:   Sh. C.P. Tiwana, Counsel for Complainant.

Sh. Karan Sharma, Counsel for Opposite Party.

^{PER MADHU MUTNEJA, PRESIDING MEMBER}

1.               

2.               

3.                 

4.               

5.               

6.               

7.               

8.               

9.               

10.              , (2005) 9 SCC 484 , the Hon’ble Apex Court has held as under:-

“8.           

11.                

12.               besides costs of litigation of Rs.10,000/-.

13.              

^Announced 

06th December, 2013.                                       

^Sd/-

 ^{(MADHU MUTNEJA)}

^{PRESIDING MEMBER}

^Sd/-

^{(JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU)}

^MEMBER

“Dutt”