Chandigarh

DF-I

CC/775/2010

Amit Sharma - Complainant(s)

Versus

Chandigarh Housing Board - Opp.Party(s)

28 Dec 2010

ORDER


CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019
CONSUMER CASE NO. 775 of 2010
1. Amit Sharmason of Sh. Parshotam Dass R/o House No. 3191 Sector-45/D, Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. Chandigarh Housing Board8, janMarg Sector9 Chandigarh through its Chairman2. Statebank of IndiaSector17/B, Chandigarh through its Manager3. State bank of IndiaNodal Branch Sector-12 Chandigarh through its Branch Manager4. Axs Bank Sector-35/B Chandigarh through itsBranch manager5. Axis Bank Head offce SEctor-17Chandigarh through its manager ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :
For the Respondent :

Dated : 28 Dec 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I

U.T. CHANDIGARH

 

                                                                                    Complaint Case No. 775 of 2010

 

 

Amit Sharma son of Sh.Parshotam Dass, resident of H.No.3191, Sector 45-D, Chandigarh.                                                                                     –  Complainant.

                                                Versus

 

1.         The Chandigarh Housing Board, 8 Jan Marg, Sector 9, Chandigarh, through its Chairman.

2.         State Bank of India, Sector 17-B, Chandigarh, through its Manager.

3.         State Bank of India, Nodal Branch, Sector 12, Chandigarh, through its Branch Manager.

4.         Axis Bank, Sector 35-B, Chandigarh, through its Branch Manager.

5.         Axis Bank, Head Office Sector 17, Chandigarh, through its Manager.

                                                                                                - Opposite Parties

 

Present:          Sh.Raj Kumar Rana, Advocate for Complainant.

                                                                                   

                                                            ORDER

 

                        The case is at preliminary stage. The learned counsel for complainant has made statement that due to technical defect, he may kindly be allowed to withdraw the present complaint with liberty to file fresh after removing the defects. He has also requested for return of documents. Accordingly, the complaint is allowed to be withdrawn without prejudice to the right of the complainant to file fresh after removing the defects, as permitted by law. The documents be returned to the complainant by retaining one set of the same.

                        Copies of this order free of cost be supplied to the parties. The file be consigned.

 

28.12.2010                 (MADHU MUTNEJA)                                         (RAJINDER SINGH GILL)      

                                                                MEMBER                                                     PRESIDING   MEMBER             



MRS. MADHU MUTNEJA, MEMBER MR. RAJINDER SINGH GILL, PRESIDING MEMBER ,