Kerala

StateCommission

A/16/177

MIRIAM S PATHROSE - Complainant(s)

Versus

CHAKOLAS MARINA APARTMENT OWNERS ASSOSIATION - Opp.Party(s)

S REGHUKUMAR

22 Feb 2024

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
 
First Appeal No. A/16/177
( Date of Filing : 14 Mar 2016 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 29/11/2014 in Case No. CC/594/2012 of District Ernakulam)
 
1. MIRIAM S PATHROSE
..
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. CHAKOLAS MARINA APARTMENT OWNERS ASSOSIATION
.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SRI.K.SURENDRA MOHAN PRESIDENT
  SRI.RADHAKRISHNAN.K.R MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 22 Feb 2024
Final Order / Judgement

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

APPEAL No. 177/2016

JUDGMENT DATED: 22.02.2024

(Against the Order in C.C. 594/2012 of DCDRC, Ernakulam)

PRESENT:

HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI. K. SURENDRA MOHAN     : PRESIDENT

SRI. RADHAKRISHNAN K.R.                                        : MEMBER

APPELLANT:

 

Miriam S. Pathrose, W/o Shaji Pathrose, 1-B, Chakolas Marina, Thevara Ferry, Pin-682 013.

 (By Advs. George Cherian Karippaparambil & S. Reghukumar)

 

 

RESPONDENTS:

 

  1. Chakolas Marina Apartment Owners’ Association, Chakolas Marina, Thevara Ferry, Pin-682 013 represented by its Secretary.

 

(By Adv. Kiran Gopinath)

 

  1. Chakolas Habitat (P) Ltd., Pandit Karuppan Road, Thevara Ferry, Pin-682 015 represented by Mathew Chakola.

 

(By Adv. Sunil Sankar)

 

JUDGMENT

HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI. K. SURENDRA MOHAN: PRESIDENT

 

No representation for the appellant.  The 1st respondent represented through counsel.  It is submitted that the 1st respondent had approached the Hon’ble High Court of Kerala by filing WP(C) No. 30766 of 2016 which has been finally disposed of as per judgment dated 01.12.2023 granting necessary reliefs.  In view of the above, it is submitted that this appeal has become infructuous.  The above aspects have been noted by us in the proceedings on 25.01.2024. The counsel for the appellant had then sought for time and we had granted time. Today there is no representation for the appellant, obviously for the reason that this appeal has become infructuous.  In view of the above, this appeal is dismissed as infructuous.

 

JUSTICE K. SURENDRA MOHAN  : PRESIDENT

 

                                                                       

jb                                                                                                RADHAKRISHNAN K.R.  : MEMBER

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SRI.K.SURENDRA MOHAN]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ SRI.RADHAKRISHNAN.K.R]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.