Maharashtra

StateCommission

A/09/1173

MR ANANT S RANE - Complainant(s)

Versus

CHAIRMAN STATE BANK COLONY - Opp.Party(s)

SMITA SANSURE

12 Jul 2010

ORDER


BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL

COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI
First Appeal No. A/09/1173
(Arisen out of Order Dated 16/05/2009 in Case No. 169/2007 of District Thane)
1. MR ANANT S RANEGIRIJA NIWAS STATE BANK COLONY NEAR MODEL ENGLISH SCHOOL MANPADA ROAD PANDURANG WADI DOMBIVLI(E) THANE Maharastra ...........Appellant(s)

Versus
1. CHAIRMAN STATE BANK COLONYSTATE BANK COLONY NEAR MODEL ENGLISH SCHOOL MANPADA ROAD PANDURANG WADI DOMBIVLI(E) Maharastra ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE :
Hon'ble Mr.Justice S.B.Mhase PRESIDENTHon'ble Mr. Dhanraj Khamatkar Member
PRESENT :SMITA SANSURE, Advocate for the Appellant 1 Madhura J.Aras, Advocate for the Respondent 1

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

Appellant/complainant is a member of respondent/society.  The dispute is between the respondent and appellant is in respect of documents of the membership and balcony which was constructed. He being the member of said society is equally owner and in that capacity there cannot be a relationship of service provider.  Consumer complaint is not tenable.  Hence, we pass following order:-

 

Appeal is hereby dismissed.

 

PRONOUNCED :
Dated : 12 July 2010

[Hon'ble Mr.Justice S.B.Mhase]PRESIDENT[Hon'ble Mr. Dhanraj Khamatkar]Member